The Inquirer-Home

Nook Simple Touch Glowlight review

We put Barnes & Noble's rival to the Kindle Paperwhite under the spotlight
Tue Nov 06 2012, 15:18

Product Nook Simple Touch Glowlight
Specifications 6in e-ink touchscreen display, 2GB storage with 750MB reserved for content, backlit display with 167ppi resolution, two months battery life with backlight off, one month with backlight on, 3.5 hour charge time, supports Epub and PDF ebook formats, WiFi connectivity, microUSB port, microSD card slot, 165x127x12mm, 197g, black
Price £109

THE RACE for this Christmas season's favourite ereader is on, and Barnes & Noble entered its contender into the British market last week with the Nook Simple Touch Glowlight, the bookstore company's first expansion outside the US.

Nook Simple Touch Glowlight backlight on

With an e-ink display that is backlit so it can be used in the dark as well as in direct sunlight with no glare, the Nook Glowlight is set to compete against Amazon's Paperwhite Kindle and the much cheaper Kobo line of ereader devices.

The firm's first Nook ereader that it launched in October 2009 has been popular in the US and helped Barnes & Noble eat into Amazon's ebook market share. Now it's the UK's turn as the firm announced partnerships with UK retailers to sell its Nook devices and content from its range of 2.5 million digital titles.

Nook Simple Touch Glowlight back

Design and build
The Nook Simple Touch Glowlight has a distinctive soft touch material covering its backside and a good part of the 18mm bezel, which is 20mm wide at the top and bottom. While this makes it easy to grip and a feels pleasant in the hand, we have to admit that it also makes the Nook look a little cheap. The fact that it easily attracts smudge marks from fingertips doesn't do it any favours in terms of appearance.

Nevertheless, the Nook Glowlight is exceptionally light, weighing just under 200g, and as a result it is comfortable to hold in just one hand. If you don't care too much about style you're unlikely to be fazed by its cumbersome looks and distinctly average and not very flattering design.


Share this:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to INQ newsletters

Sign up for INQbot – a weekly roundup of the best from the INQ

INQ Poll

Happy new year!

What tech are you most looking forward to in 2015