The Inquirer-Home

AMD Llano APU mobile platform benchmarks

CPU and GPU together for better results
Mon Jul 04 2011, 13:22

WITH ITS RECENT LAUNCH of Llano Accelerated Processing Unit (APU) chips, AMD achieved much more than just producing a quad-core PC CPU with a tightly integrated GPU. It created a base for a whole new generation of processors where the CPU and GPU can directly share memory and jointly execute a single program, with the graphics processor becoming a sort of math coprocessor to the main processor, like the 8087 was to the 8086 some 30 years ago.

There is still some way to go before we see the full benefits of that approach. Let's see how the new AMD platform performs in some of the common benchmarks. Here we have an OEM test unit with a Llano APU, made by Compal. Sleek and black but kind of big and wide, the unit is a typical midrange notebook you see these days in shops, without knowing what is inside just by observing the outside looks.

Part of the reason for the 'common look' is that it has one of those terrible productivity-wasting 16:9 movie LCD screens now shotgun enforced on all notebook vendors by a combination of greed and stinginess on the part of Far Eastern display panel makers. Why can't these PC makers be like Apple and demand what they want, as major customers? I think it's a time for a new LCD plant somewhere in China that will be flexible enough to follow customers' demands, not dictate.

Back to the hardware, the test system has the most powerful 35W mobile Llano, the AMD A8M-3500 unit, which has a full internal GPU with 400 shaders as well as highest frequency setting, at 1.5 GHz plus all the Turbo speed ups to 2.4 GHz for its four 'improved Phenom class' CPU cores with separate 1 MB L2 caches each. Top end notebooks can have a 45W Llano flavour, the A8-3530MX, with a 1.9GHz to 2.6GHz CPU speed range, but the same 444 MHz GPU core clock.

There is also 4GB of DDR3-1333 memory, as well as - guess what - a second graphics engine, a 'Turks' mobile HD5500 GPU with 512MB of memory sitting on an internal PCIe adapter! Now this is interesting, as we can test both of these, or even each, one at a time. The combined 'crossfire entity' was called HD6620, a specific number for the combined APU and outside GPU.

Share this:

Comments
More aptly, the Commodore Amiga of late 80's.

"whole new generation of processors where the CPU and GPU can directly share memory and jointly execute a single program, with the graphics processor becoming a sort of math coprocessor to the main processor, like the 8087 was to the 8086 some 30 years ago"

The Amiga had real graphics and stereo sound co-processors (and a pre-emptive OS) when the PC and Mac were still grinding along with dumb peripherals -- as continued until just recently, mostly because Microsoft is run by greedy klutzes.

posted by : anonanon, 05 July 2011 Complain about this comment
Agree re. aspect ratios

I couldn't agree more with your statement about display aspect ratios!

Gone are the days of decent, hi-res screens in a portable form. 16x9 is useless to work with (and I said WORK), especially when the smaller laptops only have a vertical resolution as little as 768 pixels. The last time I had a laptop with such a low resolution was the ultra-portable ThinkPad 570E.

Even Lenovo have succumbed to this rot and ThinkPads are meant to be business machines. It's disgraceful!

I'm hungrily eyeing up 12" ThinkPad X61 Tablets with the 1400x1050 screen before they die out and I'm not looking forward to replacing my venerable 14" T60P that has the same resolution. And yes, these 14" and 12" laptops have more pixels in EVERY direction than most 16x9s of the same size!

I simply do not want a laptop with 16x9 screen. The resolutions are far too low and the aspect ratio is useless. I *might* think about a 16x10 but only if the vertical resolution is high enough in the 14" size I'd be looking for (read a vertical res of at least 1050 pixels). Wish me luck....

Oh, and back on topic. I'm liking this whole fusion concept of AMDs.

posted by : NorthernSands, 05 July 2011 Complain about this comment
How suitable for PS4 or Xbox720?

How suitable would AMD product be with a second GPU for a next-gen console?

posted by : neo, 04 July 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?