Product Samsung Galaxy S II
Website http://www.samsung.com
Specifications Dual-core Cortex-A9 processor, 1GB RAM, 4.3in Super-AMOLED capacitive touch screen, 8MP Camera with LED Flash, Cisco WebEx support, HSPA+ 21Mbps/HSUPA 5.76Mbps, 16 or 32GB built-in storage, up to 32GB SD card support, 1650mAh battery
Price £500
KOREAN PHONE MAKER Samsung certainly tries hard when it comes to mobile phones. The company has always played a game of numbers, pushing out as many handsets as it can manage. Some are good, some are not so good. But sitting at the top end of the range, the Galaxy S II should be a strong contender for our favourite Android phone of the moment. But is it?
In a word, yes. It's great. It's not perfect, but it's a leap from the original Galaxy S smartphone, which, while sleek and beautiful, was beset with a list of problems that made Apple's patchy record with the Iphone 4 antenna-gate look positively brilliant.
Styling wise, Samsung has taken inspiration from Apple again. Unlike most Android handsets, the Galaxy S II apes Apple's central Home button. On either side of this physical key are two virtual ones. On the left, a context-sensitive Menu control and on the right, the Back button.
Android does a good job of getting a lot of value out of these controls. Hold the Menu button, for example, and you get dropped into search. Double tap the Home button and you're given access to Samsung's Vlingo-powered voice activation system. And if you hold the Home button down, then you're shown recent tasks and the option to go into Samsung's task manager.
With the original Galaxy S, the task manager was a regular destination for us. The phone's terrible lag meant that we would be constantly trying to shut down apps to recover a bit of memory and hope to give a little more processor time to the thing that was hopelessly juddering. On the Galaxy S II, we've barely used it, and that's a good thing.
The Screen
Samsung makes a big deal of the AMOLED display panel it uses in the Galaxy. We, however, are far from sold on this technology. It's certainly bright and vivid, that's for sure, but there's no colour accuracy here. Everything is bright and colourful, to the point of making you feel like you've been dragged into a cartoon by the eyeballs. It will impress you the first time you see it, but it's annoying if you want to watch video or surf the predominantly white-coloured internet without a blue hue over everything.
Extra-special damnation goes to the automatic backlight adjustment, which is utterly dreadful. It seems totally ignorant to its surroundings, changes the brightness level at the drop of a hat - but most certainly not a change in ambient light - and does so with the poise and grace of a darts player attempting ballet.
In case it's not clear, you'll want to switch the backlight adjustment to manual.
We also noticed, and this is a minor niggle, that the AMOLED screen also sufferes from mild, and temporary burn-in if you leave something on screen. We noticed this with Tweetdeck, where, after composing a tweet and pulling the notification tray down, we could see an after image of the keyboard.
It goes away quickly, though, and is never especially intrusive. It is odd though, and it does leave us with several questions about the display technology.
Speed
The great thing about the Galaxy S II's dual core ARM Cortex-A9 processor and its 1GB of RAM is that it makes the phone incredibly responsive. Swiping around from home screen to home screen is a pleasure. Apps usually start instantly, and we didn't notice scrolling quickly through a web page or Twitter app to cause problems by jerking around.
While the processor means the phone is fast and enjoyable to use, we did find that web pages didn't load as fast as they did on the HTC Sensation. Indeed, there were times when we waited a long time for a web site to appear in the browser. We're not sure why this is happening, but coming straight from the Sensation makes this all the more jarring.
Tags: Hardware
"http://fs01.androidpit.info/userfiles/476808/image/aLGOQ%20%281%29.jpg
That's all there is to be said about the 'aping' issue."
You need to check your facts. That jpg lists incorrect info -- the Samsung F700 came out in late 2007, and not early 2006. So.... that was AFTER the iPhone was officially released. Samsung pieced that thing together from a slider phone of some sort last minute to try and compete.
Just a quickie, you mentioned the music seemed to cut out randomly. This (for me at least) was due to the motion setting "turn over". If you hold or lay the phone face down, it mutes incoming calls and stops playing sounds. Happened a few times while jogging till i figured this out and turned it off.
skype video call is possible in in galaxy sII ?
It would be nicer if at least the title did not contain any mistakes :rollseyes: begin/being....
I work in a phone shop and i have used both phones extensively.I have to say this review seems very biased.For a start there is NO way the Galaxy s 2 is slower at browsing than the Sensation.My Desire HD that runs Gingerbread is faster than the Sensation.Also you forgot to mention that the screen on the Sensation has dreadful viewing angles and the blacks look grey and colour reproduction is washed out in any kind of sunlight.You get less saturation if you change the settings to standard on the GS 2..I am a big HTC fan but i have to say right now the SGS 2 is the best phone out there by a country mile..
You guys are so slow with your phone reviews, do you go out and buy them yourselves? Even if you do, you're still slow.
And not very good.
It looks nothing like the S1? LOL
Ok from the Back you might have a point.
But, from the front, yes it does look like an S1, albeitly with the Light Sensor and Front Camera positions switched 'round.
And yeah dito to the Menu - Edit function in the App-drawer.
AND DITO to it being a PITA to use too...
http://fs01.androidpit.info/userfiles/476808/image/aLGOQ%20%281%29.jpg
That's all there is to be said about the 'aping' issue.
the most basic feature...
can we make video calls with XMPP (gtalk) ???
if i will pay the double of a netbook, i should be able to make a video call over xmpp, at least.
if not, this is a garbage toy.
1. The auto-brightness issue was solved in an updated firmware.
2. You can move apps around in different pages in Touchwiz by choosing edit. Granted, it's not very easy to do, but it's there in the manual and I guess one can get used to it.
3. I don't understand how the phone looks like an iphone. It has nothing to do with the iphone, design-wise, or matterials-wise. And comparing it to the original Galaxy... really, it looks nothing, nothing like it.
I've read many SII reviews that put it at the very top of currently available Smartphones. Seems the the INQ are just HTC fanboys!
The original S (which I have) with the Gingerbread 2.3.3 update is still an excellent phone with no lag to speak of at all now. The screen is brilliant. I've never seen any image retention, and Touchwiz is not dire at all. It does what it does very effectively.
first three pictures look exactly like my galaxy s so designwise there isn't any change at all.