The Inquirer-Home

Viewsonic VX2739wm 27-inch LCD display

Review Large ultra-fast HD 1080p monitor
Fri Jun 04 2010, 12:51

Product Viewsonic VX2739wm 27-inch LCD display
Website www.viewsoniceurope.com/uk
Specifications 27-inch TFT LCD screen, 16:9 aspect ratio, 1200:1 contrast ratio (100,000:1 dynamic), 1ms response time, DVI-D, HDMI 1.3, D-sub inputs, 4xUSB2.0, USB host, 3.5mm audio in/out
Price about £280, but apparently it's not available at resellers just yet


DISPLAY MANUFACTURER Viewsonic has produced some commendable displays over the years and is no stranger to pushing boundaries in this market. In 2005 it was the first to introduce a screen with a 2ms response time, and it has gone one better with the VX2739wm on test, being the world’s first 27-inch 1ms monitor.

As impressive as this sounds it isn’t really a strong enough feature to sell the display in its own right, and the majority of LCDs we’ve tested over the last year or so have been perfectly capable of eliminating ghosting and motion-blur at around the 5ms mark. We’re hoping Viewsonic has enough extra on offer to see an admittedly impressive achievement as the cherry on the cake.

For a start, the VX2739wm is a bit of a behemoth at 27-inch in size, and boasts full HD 1080p 1920x1080 resolution along with all the connectivity you’d expect, and probably a bit more. Adorning the underside of the unit at the rear are HDMI 1.3, DVI-D and D-sub inputs, audio-in for the stereo speakers and two USB ports, along with a USB host. At the side there are two additional USB ports and a line-in, but while the abundance of data connectivity might seem like an advantage at first, it’s still not nearly as convenient as a well-placed USB hub for quick attachment of devices.

re-vx2739wm-1-rightThe VX2739wm is nicely built though, and is about as unassuming as you could expect a 27-inch display to be. A simple tilt stand does a good job of keeping the large screen stable and though it’s a shame not to see provision for height-adjustment, it coordinates well with the slimline nature of the design.

A simple series of four controls offers access to the on-screen display, though users are restricted to general contrast/brightness and colour adjustment for the most part, with dynamic contrast and eco modes available. We found the former to be quite effective for general use when switched on but the eco modes are only really suitable for darker environments. After painstakingly working with the contrast, brightness and colour balance to find an image better suited for specific uses, we concluded that the auto-adjust setting is really the best way to go, unless of course you’re patient enough to go through the effort of - relatively minor - tweaking every time a game or video file is fired up. This would be necessary because Viewsonic hasn’t included any presets or custom modes here. Quite why we’re not sure, since the display certainly lends itself to use in these very different environments.

Thankfully we were pleased enough by the overall image quality and outside more specialist applications, most users should be happy to stick to either the default or a manually-configured environment without making frequent adjustments. It’s not an outstanding showing on this front however, as colours can appear muted or overly vibrant at times, and we noticed backlight bleed at the top and bottom edges of the display that become apparent in darker scenes during video playback.

Lines are pretty sharp though, and despite the fact that we couldn’t qualify the effectiveness of the 1ms response time to any accurate degree, there was certainly no sign of lag during fast-moving scenes in games or movies. The viewing angle is also impressive, reaching around 160 degrees before colours start to fade into obscurity.

The only other real issue we have on the display front is that while 1080p is certainly impressive enough when it comes to TVs, a monitor that you would sit, say, a couple of feet away from at a desk is a different matter. High-resolution images and videos that seemed crisp and clear on smaller displays at the same resolution can suddenly exhibit undesirable pixilation here, and though there aren’t a lot of screens that boast higher resolutions at the moment, it would be fair to argue that you wouldn’t want anything larger than this without a boost in resolution.

We also gave the audio a fair test on the VX2739wm, since Viewsonic claims pseudo-surround via the SRS Premium software provided. After fiddling with the settings for some time we can conclude that the audio can sound more ‘rounded’ than you’d expect from typical stereo speakers, and it is fairly capable of distinguishing finer details in the high and mid range. Unfortunately bass is predictably conspicuous by its absence, so any kind of immersive environment - that is, games and video - will still suffer. This is no replacement for a decent set of speakers outside casual use or as a temporary convenience.

Despite highlighting quite a few negatives with the VX2739wm, this is far from an undesirable display. At its core is a capable 27” screen and in looking for more real estate to enhance the visual impact of movies and games you’ll certainly notice a difference. Those who aren’t so bothered about the potentially minor issues described above will no doubt be pleased by the impact such a large screen can have, and considering the low price this still ticks the most important boxes as a no-fuss, general use monitor.

In Short
Viewsonic’s VX2739wm isn’t capable of taking on more specialist - and more expensive - rivals in terms of pure performance, but it’s still a well-specced desktop display with plenty of connectivity and is versatile enough to handle a range of tasks. Those who are primarily looking for a large-sized screen will find few better all-purpose alternatives around at this price point. µ

The Good
Tidy and stylish design, range of connectivity, good value for money.

The Bad
Colour accuracy could be better, speakers predictably tinny.

The Ugly
Lack of environment or custom presets.

Bartender’s Score
7/10

beer7

Share this:

Comments
EPIC FAIL

i will destroy now this monitor , i had 24 '' samsung its far better then this one

color is the worse i saw on monitors and no settings to improve that

posted by : beqerel, 16 April 2011 Complain about this comment
Don't Just Whine!!

I am searching for a 27" LCD monitor, so am interested in the comments.... but don't just whine about this monitor, tell everyone what make and model of display is better and has the features you want.... might just pissoff Viewsonic as well and make them lift their game...doh!

posted by : hsan, 27 October 2010 Complain about this comment
Ad for a TV

This reads like a flyer from BestBuy; is "full 1080P" to distinguish it from a previous model with 1080i? It seems that computer monitors have been all but discontinued and TVs are all that's left. Welcome to the wonderful world of 1990s vertical resolution. How useless, just like reviewing the thing in the first place.

posted by : Jozsef, 08 June 2010 Complain about this comment
27" TV

At 1920x1080p, it is essentially a 27" TV and not much use in the real world. My 24" with 1920 x 1200 is more use.

posted by : Gary, 08 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Fail

No 16x10 = Fail

posted by : a, 07 June 2010 Complain about this comment
no 16:10??!!

This is getting ridiculous. LCD vendors need to start increasing DPI if they are going to stick to 16:9. My PC is not my TV. It's a tool I use to create documents, browse the web, etc.

First they killed all non 16:9 laptops, now the same is happening to desktops

posted by : Rob, 06 June 2010 Complain about this comment
WTF

I want to know who they are targeting to sell this thing to?

At that size you would expect a higher resolution!
If it had a display port and a low price tag it would be a suitable cheap eyefinity candidate.....buy alas it does not.

Viewsonic, gimme a 1080p 27" high degree vertical mountable monitor with displayport and watch them rush out the door! Id buy 6 for my eyefinity.

posted by : Dillinger, 05 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Huh??

Okay, let's get this straight:

- Not LED backlit?
- No 120hz capability?
- No 3D capability?
- Poor viewing angle
- Only tilt adjustable (no swivel or height adjustments)?

This monitor is a complete failure and the project development manager for this product should be fired immediately. NUFF SAID!!

posted by : Iluv2raceit, 05 June 2010 Complain about this comment
typical

What is it with fad of manu's making 16:9 monitors. For any professional, real-estate is important and 16:9 is not enough for many, 16:10 scrapes through though.

If you work on timelines (video/audio/animation), the 16:9 means a squished work space where, for example you can't show all the sequencer and all the mixer simultaniously, but it will just fit on 16:10.

2 HDMI's would have been nice and a 4 way usb hub in the base

FAIL

posted by : Sarah, 05 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Not LED backlit? Fail.

$400 is more expensive than most 27" monitors these days... admittedly most of the sub-$400 are 2-5ms, but there is no way that speed alone is worth the extra hundred bucks.

The only thing that would make this screen worth the 400 is if it were LED backlit - and it's not. Sorry Viewsonic, this monitor is nothing special.

posted by : anonymous, 04 June 2010 Complain about this comment
2 x fail

no display port
no 1200 vertical dpi

I will not buy any more monitors without those two things.

posted by : Jim, 04 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Pity about the warranty...

Don't even consider it.

I had the 28" monitor, which broke 14 months into a 2 year warranty. (HDMI input stopped working)

ViewSonic absolutely and completely refused to honour the warranty because did not have the original box for their courier to pick it back up in. (no joke)

Fucking arsewipes.

posted by : IT guy, 04 June 2010 Complain about this comment
LOL

A viewing angle of 160 is BAD. A good viewing angle is 176. So rally, nothing impressive about 160. Also, 160 means the panel is a TN-type, i.e. cheap and with pretty bad colors.

posted by : George, 04 June 2010 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?