Stewardesses is the longest English word typed only with the left hand
THIS WEEK, AMD's long anticipated HD5870 GPU, codenamed "Cypress" and the new kid on the ATI Radeon graphics block, took the "fastest GPU chip" crown away from Nvidia's GT200b in the GeForce GTX285.
You've probably read plenty about the new 2.15 billion transistor GPU with 1,600 shaders and 4.8GHz GDDR5 memory throughput, which is also the first non-classified chip of any kind to deliver 2.7TFLOPS in floating point single precision and over 500GFLOPS in double precision. Oh yes, it's true, but you've got to code under AMD Stream or OpenCL to get anywhere close to these figures, though.

The HD5870's initial GPU clock is set at 850 MHz, although overclocked editions running at up to 1GHz should be expected to appear over the next month or so. Asus's HD4870 edition card, for instance, already supports GPU clock speeds of up to 1,035MHz right now with built-in voltage tweaks.
However the real excitement will be the upcoming HD5870X2 implementation, which is expected to support up to 2 x 2GB memory configurations per card, and, if you're into GPU computing, up to 10TFLOPS of combined single precision computational power using two such cards per system.
Here we have a quick look at the new ATI GPU platform, pre-release drivers bound, on a matching high performance computing foundation - an Intel Core i7 975XE processor on the Asus Rampage II Extreme mainboard, with 6GB of Kingston DDR3-2000 RAM and a CoolerMaster V10 heat sink fan combo with TEC cooling, on a 30-inch 2560x1600 LCD display.
We ran the CPU at 4GHz across all cores, and memory at the DDR3-1600 CL6 low latency setting. Right now, what we have is an early reference sample card, and we expect to see higher performance from the final card version with newer drivers.
So, at this stage, it's just an initial look at a reference sample card using the first software driver, with a couple of 3DMark Vantage runs.
Before we run the usual 3DMark Vantage test, keep in mind that this is a 1GB card without the EyeFinity six display feature. This standard model can run 'only' three monitors at once. The EyeFinity six display port model will come with 2GB of GDDR5 RAM to handle three more screens.
Here are the 3DMark Vantage "Performance" results:

And the 3DMark Vantage "Extreme" results:

As expected, these are record setting results for a single GPU. Compare it to the GTX285 OC 2GB on the same machine, where we get just 12,102 on the GPU score in Performance mode and 5,866 in Extreme mode. The various game benchmarks on other sites also paint a similar picture.
During these benchmark runs, this early sample card was noticeably less hot than the ATI HD4870 or HD4890 cards I've handled before. And this is factory reference cooling we're talking about, and not running in the idle mode, but in the full load 3Dmark test. The black backplate, while not providing any extra cooling, does help aesthetically, as well as preventing finger scratches from the PCB back side. The card is large, just a bit smaller than its ATI Radeon HD4870X2 dual GPU predecessor, however it should still fit in most ATX casings without problems.
In summary, the new king of the GPU hill has been enthroned. For how long, we'll see - it all depends on how well the next Nvidia graphics processor, the GT300, performs. Intel's Larrabee seems to be still far enough in the future for both of these big graphics vendors not to get too worried yet. µ
As an avid user of products from both of the players in the GPU field, it is nice to see a direct, factual, informative (mini) review of this without the green directed vituperations of past authors, thankfully gone. My faith in the somewhat wacky, but always interesting INQ is getting restored.
this is all well and good except where are the glxgears results?? how many fps can this card do with glxgears running at 1024X768?? Can it even come close to a "Green" card? What?? no drivers to run glxgears under a proper os setting??? I thought so. move along.
Right, because glxgears is an awesome and accurate benchmarking tool.
way to go ati... good card. now let's see what gt300 brings to the table. whatever the case, new power supplies are going to be in order.
... and what about being future-proof (dx11)? Can the green cards do that? Oh wait... they can't!
And after all, you gotta recognize, it gotta a superb power management, I'm even sad with my HD4870 now...
It's not only about hoserpower, that Cypress chips are packed with features.
If Tweak Be yer disire, Its Already for sale:
http://en.inpai.com.cn/doc/enshowcont.asp?id=7085
before 5850 ,5770&50 will be on sale, X2 will be about $400+ in Nov., less than 5C. Hey hows cpu have higher vantage than total score?
Gtx300 yields are said to be OK, yet some question if it'll beat gtx 200. In close exam, scores seem to have fallen from near 3D 30,000+ to <20,000 thruout market. is that true?
DRASHEK
It's a bit disappointing though, that ATi has changed more than just the core clock and memory type and speed for the 5850. The only difference between the xx70 and xx50 'used' to be, that the xx50 was lower clocked and with a lesser memory type, but now it's truly lesser. iirc.
From what I've seen, these new HD5000 cards consume less power than the previous generation, especially in idle. So, no, if you've got a PSU now that's up to the task for a current-generation card, I don't see the need to upgrade.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/gpu_technology_conference.html
I would suspect we'll hear about the GT300 in 2 days and 13 hours!
you want glxgears, just buy the da*n thing. The linux driver is on the CD, you will even find an upgraded version called fgl_glxgears
Or is your problem that no one is reviewing the Linux driver, could it be that no one cares???? Oh no!!!! Maybe if linux had dx11gears it may have mattered....move along
I expect Nvidia will come along with a "patch" for their drivers and the programme to allow them to gain a higher "score".
Way to go ATi another slam dunk kick in the teeth to Nvidia, love it...
Glx gears is a waste of time, what should be more of a concern is that the evil greens are much better at Linux drivers than ATi.
As much as I hate Nvidia, they are way better on the Linux front compared to Ati.
Ati have crap installers, don't fix shocking bugs and generally are useless on Linux.
And yes there are plenty of people who care about linux drivers...
I notice all the cables are screened - I suspect not many a vendored pc will have this luxury - so why include this on the test - its not a true representation of most peoples setup - any rfi is not considered in your tests - a failing of many a card.