Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Gigabyte EX58-Extreme is flexible

First INQpressions Overclock or underpower your Core i7
Monday, 22 June 2009, 19:02

WHEN Core i7 975 was launched, it received rave reviews for its overclocking abilities on simple air cooling. Up to 4GHz is a given for pretty much every CPU and some can go even higher.

But up is not the only way. If you stick with the default speed - still a pretty fast 3.33GHz - you can wind down the voltage and save a lot of power.

Cranking up the speed is obviously what you'd do for intensive uses, like high-end gaming. Reducing power consumptiion is useful for having a greener office. In most cases, either mode can be selected from BIOS or Windows OC utility as a pre-set profile.

You need a darn good mainboard to make maximum use of this expensive chip, not just in terms of features and performance, but also power conversion. The two biggie Taiwan vendors, Asus and Gigabyte, have focused their efforts here to grab a share of early adopter money from power users, such as animation studios and engineering firms.

gigaby

This is Gigabyte's EX58-Extreme, with possibly the most advanced chipset and VRM air cooling system around. It's other features include 10 SATA2 storage ports, compared to the usual six, dual Gigabit Ethernet, Virtual Dual BIOS, Dynamic Energy Saver, and, of course, Gigabyte's 2oz Copper trademark inner mainboard layers.


The Core i7 975 CPU is cooled by a modified Thermalright heatsink using a Thermaltake 2,700rpm fan. There are 6GB of Qimonda Aeneon Xtune DDR3-1866 memory and Gigabyte's GTX250 1GB OC graphics, all running off a Corsair 1000W PSU.

We tested the sustained high-end overclocking and low-power modes on these settings:

4GHz (133MHz x Multiplier 30) OC: CPU voltage at 1.375V; memory voltage at DDR3-1600 at 1.5V.

3.33GHz (133 MHz x Multiplier 25) default: CPU voltage at 1.10V; memory voltage at DDR3-1333 at 1.4V.

In both cases, the OS had to boot smoothly, and pass the usual Sandra endurance test.

Interestingly, the Gigabyte board also supports the upcoming low voltage 1.3V and 1.4V DDR3 memory, akin to what Geil and others showed at Computex. We've also reduced all the DDR3 reference clocks in proportion.

We got the following results:

temp4ghzNote the temperature results. While the BIOS monitor showed the CPU pretty much cooler than the outside air in the test room (in Singapore), Sandra showed a more realistic 39C in the Vista for the low power mode, and 47C for the 4GHz mode. These would still be usual when running high loads, but nevertheless, these are good numbers for reliable long-term running in either case.

lowpowermonitor
The impact? In the 4GHz OC mode, yet with voltage not much higher than the CPU default, you get up to 20 per cent extra performance without dramatically increasing the system power.

lowpowervoltagedetail

Meanwhile, the low power option knocks 30 per cent off the CPU power consumption and over 10 per cent off the memory, without sacrificing any default performance. All this was done within a few hours, so more can be obtained from further BIOS tweaks.

In summary, the board performed well driving the Core i7 975 in either mode. It's overbuilt cooling may be of some help here too, keeping the test set-up reasonably cool even in a hot ambient environment.

To improve this further, Gigabyte should make the main waterblock modular for easier replacement, and use a message-based board status display rather than hex-code. µ

Share this:

Comments
close

i have the UD5, the board below the extreme and frankly its probably the best board i have ever used. i cant recommend it enough, the P6T is also a class board, but the gigabyte for me is a nose hair in front

posted by : VP, 23 June 2009 Complain about this comment
UD5

Using UD5 as well and I must say it's top notch in all departments. Highly recommended

posted by : AB, 23 June 2009 Complain about this comment
Overclocking and Games, misconception

I quote the author - "Cranking up the speed is obviously what you'd do for intensive uses, like high-end gaming."

Not true,

This is a misconception that drives me crazy. Take any modern game at a high resolution, like a real gamer would play it, and you will find 100% of the time that the graphics card is the bottleneck. Gamers overspend on the CPU and underspend on the graphics component because of this perception that overclocking a high end CPU is going to show them some kind of real world yield in their game frame rates, but unless its an older CPU limited title like Unreal Tournament 2004 for example, its already running many times past your monitors refresh so it no longer matters, it has no real world measurable value in gaming performance.

This idea of an "Extreme" model CPU being sold and marketed to gamers is a sham. Sure, it improves your 3D mark scores because there is a CPU specific test, but it in no way improves your frame rate in intense modern GPU limited titles like Crysis and Call of Duty World at War.

Now, I love an unlocked processor, I think they are great, but the value in overclocking is not in 3D gaming. If you want a better 3D gaming experience, buy, save some money, but a good dual core, maybe a tripple, or a less expensive quad, and put the savings into a smoking graphics card.

posted by : Cliff, 24 June 2009 Complain about this comment
@Cliff

working for NV?
With a NV 280, If you don t have a 30 inchs monitor, the best way to increase the speed of your gaming experience IS to increase the speed of your processor.

Can we stop painting the world with 30" inches monitors? the people usually don t have this kind, the average resolution today is 1600x1200 and moving to 1920x1080 ... We are far from the 2560x1200! There is a 33% difference on the pixels, or about 1 millions pixels difference.
The world uses at max 2 millions pixels screen, and the misconception , well, you was showing it big time. reality: PEOPLE DON T HAVE 3 MILLIONS PIXELs SCRREN. THE PROCESSOR DOES HELP THE SCALING, TRY IT BEFORE WRITING MISCONCEPTED CORRECTION FOR A MISCONCEPTION lOL ... Nova is right!
Thanks Nova for verifying what I told you! 975 can fit into very small form factor with its awesome processing power if you undervolt it!

posted by : Francois, 24 June 2009 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?