Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Asus cools down the HD4870X2, we run it on Core i7

Asus HD4870X2 card AMD on Intel, position "on a top"
Monday, 22 December 2008, 17:09

AMD's GRAPHICS ARM, known as ATI in the olden days, did a pretty decent job with the R700 card and its dual RV770 chips - the HD4870X2 has only recently been beaten by Nvidia with its GTX295 dual GPU contraption.

However, the X2 was, and still is, a pretty hot card in terms of both popularity and temperatures achievable. I didn't need to poke about with a thermometer to feel the heat reaching close to the water boiling point around the thingie when running, and noticeably heating up the air in the whole PC, for that matter.

The big graphics card vendors had two options on hand: one, improve the air cooling to the point that enables fully stable operation with some overclocking thrown in easily, or two, slap on some exotic cooling option like a water or vapour chamber. Asus opted for the first one, while Sapphire went with the second one. Here's the first look at the Asus offering.

Asus4870x2

We put together the card on our trusty old Nehalem reference testbed: Intel's Core i7 965 extreme flavour sitting on an Asus P6T Deluxe mobo, this time with 3GB of Kingston DDR3-2000 memory. With the most recent BIOSes, this platform is rock-solid at 4 GHz CPU speed and DDR3-1866 memory, all air cooled.

Air cooled is the name of the game for the Asus HD4870X2 too... and lots of air, at that. Three synced fans with a jet engine effect, according to Asus, reduce the temperatures by up to some 24ºC compared to the reference board, and provide for some nice O/C margins - like, for instance, running both GPUs at 800 MHz, and memory at GDDR3-4000 speed. I could even complete the 3Dmark Vantage round at that speed setting - provided I added another fan to blow some air on the back of the card PCB. Knowing it was 32ºC in Singapore this past Sunday, we can tolerate it.

Nevertheless, to avoid any bias finger pointing, here are the performance and extreme results for 3DMark Vantage on the card's default clocks with our dearest 4 GHz Nehalem.

 3dmasus4870x2p

3dmasus4870x2x

So, the card sat on top of the Intel platform, in her favourite position, made quite a bit of noise while doing it – far less than her reference sister, though – and performed well in this particular session of passion. Yes, it stayed cool all the way, too. A good match for these initial Nehalems, definitely.

The only issue is its thickness. The card takes something like two and-a-half slots and, while some of my boards have three-slot spacing between the graphics slots for Crossfire, it may not  always be the case if you want dual-card operation. On the other hand, if you get this kind of card, you'll rarely have a need for a second one.

If you're looking for something slimmer, the Sapphire water-cooled 4870X2 offering may be an interesting option, provided you can handle the added baggage of mandatory common CPU cooling and hanging its radiator somewhere else within your PC house. We'll be looking at that one as well soon. µ

Good
Cool operation at full speed and decent overclock without exotic stuff
Bad
It'd be good if the total thickness could be compressed somewhat
Ugly
It's one fat card

Bartender's Verdict
8 out of 10

Beer08

Share this:

Comments
It is about time

that graphic vendors would separate the cards from the motherboard and put them in an external table-top box - hooked via bus extender card+cable. We don't need those monstereous contraptions, with their power requirement and heat generation, inside our case.

posted by : Jacob, 23 December 2008 Complain about this comment
Mr

Does Nova review anything other than Asus? Fanboys make the worst journos.

posted by : Mark, 24 December 2008 Complain about this comment
@Jacob

I understand the point that you are trying to make, but the closer the Graphics card is to the motherboard, the higher the speeds you can run. What this means is that there are shorter track lengths, i.e. less distance for the electricity to travel, less resistance. Now you probably can run a graphics card as a separate unit outside your PC case, but you will not have the same performance.

posted by : Anon, 24 December 2008 Complain about this comment
@Anon

That's not entirely correct, electricity travels at speeds almost similar to that of light so it doesn't matter if the card is stuffed in the board or wired and placed on a table it's not as if you'll be using several kilometers of wire. Regarding the resistance offered by the wires, there are lots of new technology to compensate for that otherwise just use thicker wires.

posted by : Bman, 19 March 2009 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Windows 7 impressions

How is windows 7 working out for you?