The Inquirer-Home

Samsung SM226BW 22-inch LCD widens your horizons

First INQpressions What a beauty
Mon Jul 23 2007, 10:47

Product: Samsung SM226BW 22" Widescreen LCD Monitor
Website: Samsung product details
System Requirements: Either a DVI or VGA connection
Price: approx. €325, £230, $439

WE'VE JUST GOT our hands on the monitor of the moment, the Samsung Syncmaster SM226BW, and it's truly lovely.

The monitor boasts a response time of 2ms, and a 3000:1 dynamic contrast ratio.

alt='226bw'
The 226BW.

We put it through its paces using a variety of games, DVDs and high-motion videos, and it performed admirably on all occasions, with no lag, excellent image quality, and vivid colours. There was relatively little back-light bleeding - a common niggle of modern panels.

It's also got the newly ubiquitous HDCP compliant DVI connection, which is necessary if you wish to view DRM infected HD content via Vista. It's probably not worth purchasing a screen nowadays unless it supports HDCP.

There are no extras such as USB ports or built-in speakers, but it does feature a VGA connection. This allows a slimline look, with a black and silver finish, similar to that of a Sony Bravia TV.

alt='226bwback'
The ports

Samsung also has the rear ports completely covered by a plastic cover (not shown above), which allows a tidy, cable captured finish at the back.

The native resolution of 1,680 x 1,050, standard for 22-inch panels, is just short of 'full HD' in terms of vertical resolution, so it needs to scale down for full HD and scale up for 720p content, but the screen dealt nicely with both.

The only snipe we can manage is that the A and C panels used in some of the monitor batches are allegedly inferior, and you may wish to ensure your supplier is stocking the S panel stock.

The S version denotes the use of a Samsung LCD panel, the A version uses an AU Optronics panel, and the C monitor utilises a Chi Mei panel.

While people have been reluctant to get the A and C panels, it appears that fears may not be well founded, and that you'll probably get a similarly performing product. We noticed a tinge more blue on the A panel than the S (we've not managed to get a C yet), but this is configurable to closely match the performance of the S.

We must mention that a lot of forum feedback has been more critical of the C panel than that of the A. We must also state that we're more than happy with the performance of both the S and A monitors we received for review, but the S does have the edge considering it's out-of-the-box calibration.

alt='226bwfront'
The control panel up-close

If you've managed to get an A or a C, check out this or this link which will enable you to match the S's colour and quality.

Our A panel stated it was the A variety on the back of the monitor, but to truly check what panel you have you need to turn the screen on and look at a hidden engineers menu option, stating exactly what panel it is. Oddly, our A version had this specification missing from the menu, and we suspect Samsung has done this purposely to stop people from knowing exactly what they have.

If you want to examine your 226BW's details, consider using this link from BCCHardware to help you in your quest.

Specifications:

  • Product Description: Samsung Syncmaster SM226BW 22-inch LCD Monitor ("S" Panel)
  • Device Type: Flat panel display / TFT active matrix
  • Colour: Black
  • Dimensions: (WxDxH) 51.5 cm x 6.3 cm x 35.3 cm
  • Weight: 7.4 kg
  • Diagonal Size: 22 inches - widescreen
  • Viewable Size: 22 inches
  • Dot Pitch / Pixel Pitch: 0.282 mm
  • Max Resolution: 1680 x 1050 / 60 Hz
  • Colour support: 24-bit (16.7 million colours)
  • Response Time: 2 ms
  • Image Brightness: 300 cd/m2
  • Image Contrast Ratio: 1000:1 (3000:1 Dynamic)
  • Interface: DVI, Analogue VGA D-Sub (HD-15)
  • Power: AC 120/230 V ( 50/60 Hz )
  • Power Consumption: Operational 55 Watt
  • HDCP compliant DVI connection

In Short
The most impressive performing 22-inch monitor on the market at the moment, coupled with its gorgeous looks, make the SM226BW a real winner.

We love it.

The Good
Fast response (2ms)
Cheap, at around £230
Beautiful good looks

The Bad
Ensuring you have the 'S' panel.
Cable tidy is a bit flimsy

The Ugly
Not much!

Bartender's Report
alt='beer09'

?

 

Share this:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters

Sign up for INQbot – a weekly roundup of the best from the INQ

Advertisement
INQ Poll

Heartbleed bug discovered in OpenSSL

Have you reacted to Heartbleed?