Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Great phones, shame there's only Windows on them

First INQpressions E-Ten Glofiish X600, X800
Monday, 14 January 2008, 18:27

Products X800 and X600 PDA phones
Website www.glofiish.com

MOST TAIWANESE mobile phone firms tend to use their mobile PC prowess to create hardware-rich PDA++ phone devices. In many cases, these border on being ultra-mobile PCs.

Here we have a look at two such recent units from E-Ten: Glofiish (yeah, double "i" supposedly to attract curiosity) X600 and X800.

Looks
Both GPS-enabled units share similar PDA-like size of 113x60x16mm, 147grammes, for the X800, and slightly more sleek 107x58x15 mm at 136g for the X600.

Both use Samsung SC3 2442 processor wih 64MB free RAM - 400MHz in X600, and 500MHz in the X800. The 2.8-inch touchscreen display diagonals are the same, too - as well as the Windows Mobile 6 Professional platform. WiFi b/g and MicroSD card support are there on both models, as well as common charger type.

alt='glofiishnew'

That's where the most similarities end. Looks-wise, the higher-end X800's silver-black design makes it feel more 'serious' and classy, but the X600 actually feels sleeker and handier.

Features
The X800's screen is full VGA 640x480 resolution. With this screen, yeah a nearly-whole web page is visible on a free wireless service here in Singapore, instead of overlapped frames on the QVGA 320x240 screen of the X600.

Also, the quadrupled resolution let's you view the Word, Excel and PPT documents - or MP4-compressed DVD movies from the microSD - with reasonable clarity for a cellphone if your eyes are still young.

Both phones have 2Mpixel flash-photo cameras, with the X800 also boasting an additional small front video-conferencing cam - just like with most phones, the lack of image stabilising coupled with our old shaky hands results in mostly blurred photos.

The X800 also has 3.5G HSDPA on top of the usual quad-band GSM/EGPRS. Reception-wise, we had little problems here in Singapore, as the 3-G coverage is near total - in the Wi-Fi mode, the battery usage went up rapidly though. We had to recharge the phone after half a day of Wi-Fi turned on, on top of the usual calls. The X600 has the same problem - as do most cellphones when used in WiFi mode.

The touchscreen on both phones works fine, either with pen or with nailtips, if you have some - fingertips won't do, unless you go for "easy keyboard" option with big keys on the touchscreen.

As for the user experience - well, it's Windows Mobile, that says it all. Our suggestion is - not just for E-Ten, but all cellphone vendors withour their own OS platform - to give a choice. Some users may prefer Windoze, (many) others would want Symbian instead. Symbian is more phone user-oriented, while Win Mobile looks too much like a shrunken PC.

At the end of the day, the phone is there primarily to make and receive phone calls, then for the messages and, maybe, video talk. Only then come things like Net browsing, WiFi Skyping (although that one may go up in importance), photo taking and media playback.

The phone
Both these phones have decent loudspeakers for speakerphone mode chat, and the 2.8-inch big screen results in touchpad phone "keys" big enough even for fat fingers. The Motorola Bluetooth headset worked fine too.

SMS addicts are likley to prefer the M800 model. It has a full QWERTY keyboard at the cost of extra few millimetres of thickness. SMS typing on the X800 or X600 with a pen and small keyboard touchscreen setting was really a pain, while nailtip SMSing using "easy keyboard" was just a tad slower than the "open butterfly" keyboard of the Nokia E70.

Summary
E-Tech may not have the visibility of HTC yet, but these phones are a good move in that direction. The X600 should also get 3.5 G, while X800 and M800 get better 5 Mpixel optical zoom photo cameras like those SonyEricsson or Samsung units.

Finally, providing a choice of Windows or Symbian would, in my mind, be a very good differentating move against the local competition. OK, Windoze Mobile is usable, but offering a choice would - at the cost of some extra support costs - vastly expand the customer base.

The Good Sleek designs with big displays; VGA and dual cameras on X800
The Bad No 3G on X600; battery usage needs improvement
The Ugly For Symbian users, this is Windows only stuff - for now

alt='beer7'

Share this:

Comments
Well..

Actually Windows Mobile provides far better development tool chains and debugging tool than Symbian OS, and that's the reason why they stick with M$ route. If you have experience to developing BSP Drivers on Symbian platform and this is surely a headache, in most time you have to printf everything to debugging BSP drivers and everything on Symbian platform.

posted by : n00b0wnage, 15 January 2008 Complain about this comment
Symbian vs Windows

symbian and windows mobile are incomprable, symbian is young and missing important application developement features, is buggy and largly undocumented windows mobile is an open platform and has all the features you'd expect from a develpoment enviroment and is well documented.

this is from a development perspecive of course and the author was talking about user perspective.

posted by : The Sombrero Kid, 15 January 2008 Complain about this comment
I like WM

Hi,
also if you dislike Windows Mobile, i like it, because of the Programs you get for Windows Mobile. There are quite a lot of Programs for WM i really would miss.

So, if this MobilePhone would be delivered with Symbion, i would never buy it.

posted by : DiG, 15 January 2008 Complain about this comment
Blinded by Anti-MS Bias

As much as I enjoy reading the articles on this website, you could try being objective when it comes to Microsoft for a change. 

Symbian's UI is poorly laid out and confusing. At least with Windows I can use it out of the box without having to read a poorly written user manual. Further, Windows Mobile provides many functions which aren't supported by any Symbian phone I've owned.

posted by : Ray, 15 January 2008 Complain about this comment
I don't like WM

I've been banging on about the way Windows turned my phones and PDAs into retards by making the simplest tasks - starting up, dialling numbers, checking messages - take several decades longer than I was prepared to wait.

The interface on both WM devices I've owned was slower than two overweight dinosaurs going uphill in a milk float, to the point where incoming calls actually used to make the ringtone stutter if I happened to be trudging through the contacts list at the same time. Windows 95, anyone?

To cut a long rant short, absolutely none of this is surprising given that these 'mobile devices' have all the undulating flabby bits of Windows but the processing power of a hamster with which to make it all move. You've got to (a) really really want the familiarity or (b) not know any better to put up with it. Screw the features if it's borderline unusable!

posted by : ThwartedEfforts, 15 January 2008 Complain about this comment
WM far more flexible

The advantage of having Windows Mobile is that if you don't like the built-in applications, there are thousands of 3rd party ones you can use instead.

Sure the default WM user interface is pretty clunky, but the whole point is that you can install replacements or additions to suit you needs. For example, if you prefer a cleaner, touch/finger oriented UI, there are an increasing number of (free and paid for) apps which work like this. Alternatively, if you are happy with the stylus, and want more information and options on-screen, there are many choices available for this style too, or you can use a mixture of the two in different applications. 

That's the 'beauty' of WM...you can customise it to be more-or-less whatever you want it to be, so you're not limited to one company's vision of how it thinks you should work.

Sure, there are definitely some improvements and optimisations to WM that could be made 'under the bonnet', but currently it's the most flexible, customisable and powerful mobile phone OS available. 

posted by : Ben, 16 January 2008 Complain about this comment
umm

personally i prefer linux powered phones like the motorolas smartphones, neo freerunner or with the new google Android (also linux based)

i would never buy a windows mobile phone, having it in a pc is too much of a headache already.

posted by : manny, 16 January 2008 Complain about this comment
Irrelevant

Had WinM and Symbian...

Guess what ... I still have symbian... WinMo... well It had to take of... Long trip and slow speed so I let it go...

If you love them they will come back (not)

posted by : Bomn, 12 December 2008 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Browsers

Who will win the next round of browser wars?