SOME NEWS SOURCES are now so convinced that Apple will announce a new tablet computer within the next few months that they are presenting the hypothesis as fact rather than conjecture or wishful thinking.

It's real, honest guv: Some of the finest Photoshop fakery money can buy
We at The Inq, on the other hand are cut from a sterner cloth and will remain agnostic about the fabled Apple Tablet until we can actually hold one in our sweaty mitts. It's not that we are unbelievers - we also think the probability of the Cupertino company coming up with a touch-screen device which sits neatly between the Ipod/Iphone and Macbook marques is quite high. We just think some of the devil in the detail doesn't add up.
Take the predicted price point for example. Most pundits are pegging the mythical beast at anywhere between $700 and $1,000. Now we know that's not chump change in anyone's book, but Apple just doesn't do cheap. If Jobs and all his little minions are going to bless the faithful with a revolutionary new product, it's not going to be built down to a price. Apple didn't invest cartloads of cash in the technology which allows it to hew computer chassis out of single blocks of aluminium for nothing. The chances of the first iteration of the Itable(t) - as we've just decided to name it - being made from polycarbonate are, in our opinion, next to none. Two or three years down the line Apple may decide to offer a lite version of the device for those of us with restricted budgets, but Apple has never needed to cut its costs and, as long as it maintains its cultish status with millions of Macolytes, it never will.
Which brings us onto design. Just about everyone with an opinion on the matter has decided that the Itable(t) (maybe Islate is better) will look to all the world like a mutant Iphone. Some have gone to great lengths making convincing Photoshopped mock-ups of the non existent device, and very pretty they look too. But they have failed to take one very important thing into consideration. Knowing your way around the distort functions in Photoshop does not make you an industrial designer. It certainly doesn't make you an industrial designer of the stature of Apple's British wunderkind Jonathan Ive.
Ive is probably the most talented designer of his generation. His work is everywhere you look and Apple obviously pays him a small fortune to come up with innovative and utterly desirable products. He also has an ego.
Given free reign - which he undoubtedly is - to design the Islab, the chances of Ive kicking back in his chair and saying, "Cobblers to all this working malarkey, just make it look like a bloody great Iphone on steroids," are slim to none. Again, this will not be a cheap product. It will be a premium device aimed at the same people who bought a Macbook Air despite a price tag scary enough to make your gonads beat a hasty retreat.
Chances are the Itab will take its design cues from that direction, rather than the shiny black plastickery of the Iphone and Ipod Touch. It's true that these devices are beautiful and desirable, but make that slab of a scratch magnet ten times the size and you are just asking for trouble. Just ask anyone who has ever put their Iphone in the same pocket as their keys for more than a nanosecond.
When the Iphone was released onto an unsuspecting market, it was totally unlike anything else available. Pundits howled that it was too big, that no-one wanted a touch-screen phone, that PDAs had to have proper keyboards, that nobody was really interested in playing games on a mobile phone.
Two years on and words seem to be the dish of the day. Every single handset manufacturer on the planet has shamelessly copied the Iphone's form and functionality. And every major player has tried to mimic the staggeringly successful App Store, which recently passed the 2 billion downloads milestone.
If Ives wants to make as big a splash with the iPill (OK bottom of barrel reached, we'll stop now - ed) he knows he'll have to pull something utterly brilliant and totally different out of the bag. And it won't be the product of the mind of anyone who does a bit of Photoshop jiggery pokery for a sorry little Apple fanboi Web site.
So 'what will the device look like?' we hear you cry. We don't know. Haven't got a clue. And do you know why we haven't got a clue? Because we are not paid millions of dollars to be one of the finest industrial designers who has ever walked the planet! We write inflammatory nonsense for a website based in some instances on guesswork, conjecture, bullplop and wishful thinking. It's not our place to know these things, it's our place to wait and see… and hopefully have our metaphorical socks blown off if and when the thing ever materialises.
A quick Google search will dig up all sorts of theories, some even claiming to be based on real encounters with Itable(t) prototypes. But how many prototypes would Apple have made of such an important product? Do you really think there would be just the one? Prototypes are made for a reason, they help human beings to make informed decisions about how products feel and fit into the real world. And if a prototype fails to make the grade or live up to expectations, it is consigned forever to the dustbin of history.
So what are our predictions for Apple's next stride forward into computer legend? Well… if you're going to twist our arm. As we've already suggested, it won't be cheap. $1,200 will be the absolute minimum for an entry level model. The first batch will be made using Apple's aluminium monoblock technology and will look more like the dismembered screen from a Macbook Air than an Iphone.
There will be no speakers built into the device to cut down on size, weight and magnetic interference. It will, however, feature a microphone, and speech recognition will play a big part in the user interface.
More traditional input will be via an on-screen virtual keyboard much like the Iphone's but there will be a twist. Keys will be arranged in two groups on either side of the screen allowing users to grasp the tablet by its edges and type using two thumbs. Anyone who has ever seen a teenager texting at 120 words a minute will get the picture.
You will, of course be able to use a traditional QWERTY layout but, as we all know, the QWERTY keyboard was designed to slow down typists using manual typewriters to prevent the keys from jamming. If anyone can drag us away from this anachronistic standard, Apple can. Lets' face it, who really thought the Ipod's Clickwheel was a good idea when they first encountered it?
Ports and plugholes will be kept to an absolute minimum to prevent possible damage from environmental factors like dust. This device is not meant to replace your computer, it is an extension of it, a peripheral if you will. Connectivity duties will be carried out by a simple dock which will also act as a stand, allowing the tablet to be used as a traditional desktop monitor, and all the ports will be included in the dock.
This is, of course, just the ill-considered opinion of one person and should not be taken as fact. Unlike some lesser web sites, we are not presenting it as such. µ
TOP TEN UTTERLY INNACURATE APPLE PREDICTIONS
from your big brothers at ElReg. one better known as Bill Ray.
Why the iPhone will fail and fail badly.
Remember that cr*p" "vision" he presented?
I agree with your idea about the industrial design of the iTablet. It will probably be different from the iphone because being different and new will make a big splash. The iphone's aesthetic design is very constrained by size limitations but a tablet will be less constrained so we can expect more a more elaborate design. I don't think the price will top $100 however. Milling a block of aluminum doesn't cost THAT much. Somewhere around ~$700 is my guess.
'Keys will be arranged in two groups on either side of the screen allowing users to grasp the tablet by its edges and type using two thumbs. Anyone who has ever seen a teenager texting at 120 words a minute will get the picture.'
In other words like the one Microsoft did for the UMPC:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11732808/page/2/
If Apple want to make a real tablet then good handwriting recog is a must and Ink is nowhere near. Vista's was pretty good and Windows 7's is just plain scary.
Hi- Ultee' Steve here With GOOD News, dosn't it just Make Sense That New bigger TABLET Will do More than these Small Crummy Ones That Almost Killed Me?
Watch CES Show....Watch For CES Show & Its Apple SubShowing IN Those Next weeks.... Look to CES Shows.
Hope Steve Puts Telephone in it, To Save ultee' Brain or where'd drashek Be?
Real fight Is Whom Invented LIGHTPEAK, well, Know that Dr.asher. Man those Peaks, RED & RAW.
In Mean Time Looks Like.Sig: i Tab PRN IS Almost Redie. Signed: Madonna & Apple drashek
Not convinced about the keys on either side idea - mainly because Microsoft already thought that one up for their tablets...
And not convinced about no speakers, either - the dock will no doubt contain the main speakers (for movies), but I would expect the tablet to have at least some form of sound generation.
Will it have a self destruct button or just blow up on its own?
Itablet may/will be the first holeless device. With inductive charging and wireless talk to the world. And will be shown in ads used by scuba divers and people like them.W
Keys on either side sounds too Intel/MS MID-ey. They already sell a bluetooth keyboard so that'd be the sensible approach (and more sales). And handwriting, but they can't demo handwriting as a big feature or they'll be savaged by the press again (a pity).
...as to the Cube - for being an amusingly flawed design (speaking of design-geniuses) as far as the blockable vents went, it did launch a thousand mini-ITX boxes (and their own rather successful Mini). So that wasn't really a bad call - people seem to have a thing for cubes, but won't pay a $500 premium for them.
Now, if they hadn't fucked that up (o, for some simple raised plastic... maybe a mushroom vent), then maybe passive cooling wouldn't have died on the desktop for the past N years.
I stopped being a mac guy (long time mac guy) when the first G3 came out. This was supposed to be Apple's top of the line workstation and it looks gawd awful. Everyone at the time thought it was something brilliant from the future. TERRIBLE. Look at them now, would anyone have that crap on their desk? And what about the iMac? It looks TERRIBLE. The current pro lines are the only thing that are decent. The iPhone/iPod compared to the new ZuneHD looks like utter comical kid crap. Whatever they are paying someone for design tips, its too much.
I saw a very bright tunneling light...
I was wearing a helmet of opposite attraction and facing a furacious snow leper...
Then the dungeon-master diced-me out and took my wine.
Cor figure!
I found this article to be quite thoughtfully done. It is also one of the few articles on the subject to actually consider the possibility that Apple may not even be working on such a device.
The Iwhatever's existence is always just assumed by everyone, and all the discussion then centers on the features, price, and release date. Perhaps they are laughing sanitarily into their elbows back in Cupertino.
If Apple is about to launch such a device, let's hope that Mr. Ives' "blank slate" is as comprehensively thought through as Mr. Meagher's.
"UltraPortable PCs from Apple using Flash memory will be delivered as early as 2007." (Benjamin Reitzes)
- well they did release the SSD-equipped ultraportable PC (MacBook Air) just 15 days later (Jan 15 2008)
Any kind of tablet or netbook from Apple has to wait until they figure out the software part, develop an integrated, intuitive user interface that's tailored to the form factor. That's what they do better than anyone else.
My prediction is Apple is looking more at a e-reader than a tablet per se., and that it won't be much more than $500.
If the tablet is indeed using the iphone operating system instead of something real, then it will be ARM based and priced accordingly.
The problem with tablets and MIDs hasn't been functionality, it's been cost and battery life. Noone is going to pay top dollar for something they can't crank out a spreadsheet on. If this tablet exists, it will cost no more than $399. If it's more than this, then it's already irrelevant and Steve Jobs shouldn't have bothered.
We all know that the iTable(t) will be (was?) formed in the presence of a burning bush, on the mount of Sinai. However, the true paradigm shift will occur when Apple releases the long-awaited Macbook Wheel.
"The agile aardvark arrived by airmail."
the actual working version of the thingy to cost $2000, you know -the one I want. It'll have the fast processor, lots of ram, a 128 gb ssd, a billion ways to connect online. $1200 will buy you the cut-rate slow motion one.
Hey is the INQ not bashing Apple anymore? Or is it because Mr Farrell is not writing this article? Good to see some straight forward stories on Apple without the stupid “Apple is evil crap”.
Finally some sensible-ness!
Finally someone who sees, like I've been telling people for ages too, that any tablet cannot cost the $700-$900 you see quoted everywhere.
People tend to forget that a new unlocked iPhone 3GS would cost you $1000 due to getting it so 'cheap' on a contract.
There is no way a tablet will be less than an iPhone now is there, unless the tablet too is sold on contract, heavily subsidised and with a monthly fee to pay.
Dave
My very humble best guess is that the whole discussion is driven too much by aesthetics. Small wonder, considering the "Macolyte" demographic.
If I were Steve Jobs I'd like to have something that can be sold to the print media people like that phone was sold to the Telcos.
Just imagine a decent digital ink driven device as a single source digital drain walled garden for what used to be print.
You may also sell it to the Mail Order bunch because - seriously - their online catalogs suck big time.
'We at The Inq, on the other hand are cut from a sterner cloth and will remain agnostic about the fabled Apple Tablet until we can actually hold one in our sweaty mitts.'
Oh, yeah, right, you mean like all those other believable articles? Google buying Valve? Really guys?
To your credit the bullshit percentage has gone down since Charlie left.. Not that he's not a nice guy but he wrote a lot of crap.
brilliant read...
No one will buy colorful computers; people like beige.