CHIPMAKER Intel will discontinue its LGA1366 Core i7 processors due to falling demand.
Intel's LGA1336 Core i7 chips have recently been overtaken in the enthusiast and single processor workstation markets by Sandy Bridge E LGA2011 chips using the firm's X79 chipset. Intel cited falling demand for the quad-core Core i7-930, 950, 960 and hex-core Core i7-980 and 990X chips - effectively every LGA1366 Core i7 chip the firm is selling - as the reason for its decision.
Intel said that for both its retail boxed chips and 1000-unit trays the last order date will be 29 June 2012, with the last delivery of tray chips to be made a year from now on 7 December 2012.
Demand for Intel's once range-topping LGA1366 Core i7 chips has been steadily falling since Chipzilla released its Sandy Bridge processors earlier this year. Although the X58 chipset has triple channel memory and supports both AMD's Crossfire and Nvidia's SLI multi-GPU technology, the performance gains provided even by the six-core Gulftown chips over the newer Sandy Bridge processors were minimal for many workloads.
Intel introduced its X79 chipset and LGA2011 socket last month, which took the mantles of the X58 and LGA1366, respectively. Those overclockers who jumped onto the X58 thanks to the Core i7-920 will have to decide whether to go with a six-core Gulftown chip or make the leap to X79 and LGA2011 within six months to a year. µ
Tags: Intel
WTF!
The Sandy Bridge CPUs are crap, they have a DAMNED SERIOUS multi-threading bug which makes CAS operations run like an absolute dog!
The i7 walks all over Sandy Bridge CPU for CAS stuff because Intel cocked up and I haven't heard of any fix for this yet; bet it's an architecture issue.
I'm glad I have an i7 at home and at work rather than a chasm; the extra cost is worth it.
Actually AMD had to switch from socket 939 to AMD due to the industry moving to DDR2. They had to switch over or else people would be spending 3 times the money on their RAM - Not worth it.
Intel is going to drop 1366 "due to falling demand"?
Well maybe demand wouldn't be falling if they hadn't been planning to replace it since it was still pretty new, people tend not to buy into a platform after you state isn't going to basically be left behind. What did they expect.
Oh and ridiculously overpricing the 1366 processors helped a lot I'm sure.
Falling demand? More like been killing it off now trying to blame the consumer so those that forked out a small fortune to adopt to 1366 expecting a long lifespan or "future proof" don't blame Intel.
Well guess what, it's all Intel's fault, just like AMD and their 939 that they abruptly abandoned, at least lately AMD has been doing a great job supporting the sockets they releae..