The Inquirer-Home

Oracle accuses HP of false advertising over Itanium

Doomed from the start
Mon Dec 05 2011, 09:32

ENTERPRISE VENDOR Oracle has accused HP of false advertising in order to sell Itanium servers.

Oracle revised its lawsuit against HP claiming the firm "made false and deceptive statements" to Oracle and the public. Those statements regarding the future of Intel's Itanium chip, according to Oracle, were used to induce Oracle to continue developing software for the chip.

Oracle's latest accusations came on the back of its claim that HP had made Intel sign a contract to develop Itanium processors for a certain period of time. HP later admitted there was a development contract between the two companies, though HP wouldn't say when it will expire.

HP has maintained that Oracle's decision to stop developing for Intel's IA64 architecture was a cynical ploy to get customers to buy its own Sun servers. HP's Michael Thacker told Bloomberg, "Oracle is in breach of its contractual commitments to HP, and it has failed to honor its promises to customers." Thacker accused Oracle of "making up claims against HP".

Oracle's claim of false advertising regarding the future of Itanium is a curious claim given its knowledge of a development contract between HP and Intel. Such a contract should have given Itanium customers such as Oracle a sense of security that Itanium would be around despite its flagging sales.

At this point Oracle's lawsuit looks more like buyer's remorse than anything else. Clearly Itanium sales did not ramp up as HP, Intel and Oracle had expected. With the three firms signing contracts, they had to dedicate resources in order to develop hardware and software for a chip that few wanted, consuming development resources for very little gain. µ

Share this:

Comments
Huh?

"... Oracle's lawsuit looks more like buyer's remorse ..."

It is HP that is suing Oracle.

posted by : John Doe, 05 December 2011 Complain about this comment
Itanic was an unqualified success

Intel succeeded in driving Alpha, PA-RISC, and MIPS out of the market while giving it time to beef up Xeon. It also contributed to FUD Intel was sowing about AMD's viability as an ongoing player because, unlike x86, AMD would never be able to clone Itanic.

posted by : SV Guy, 05 December 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?