The Inquirer-Home

Judge orders Google, Facebook and others to delist counterfeit goods web sites

Updated Major victory against online black market
Wed Nov 30 2011, 15:05

A US JUDGE has ruled that Google, Yahoo, Twitter and Facebook, along with other search engines and social networks, must remove links to web sites selling fake goods, marking a landmark victory against the online black market.

Fashion vendor Chanel launched the case by suing 600 web sites that were deemed to be selling counterfeit Chanel products, usually at significantly cheaper prices than the genuine products. The web sites primarily sold handbags, watches and sunglasses.

Judge Dawson of the Nevada US District Court ordered Google, Microsoft and Yahoo to delist the offending web sites from their search engines, and also told Facebook, Twitter and Google to remove the links from their social networks, according to the BBC.

The judge also ordered domain name company Godaddy to take control of the web site domains and block them from being accessed.

Finally, the defendants were told to cease selling Chanel products or using Chanel's name, logo and related trademarks.

Google has previously fought against counterfeit goods sellers exploiting its Adwords network, closing down thousands of accounts, but this ruling will force it to address listings on its search engine and in Google+.

Ebay was also ordered to take greater involvement in weeding out fake product listings when the EU Court of Justice told it in July that it might be liable for trademark infringement if it does not remove sellers of counterfeit L'Oreal products.

The INQUIRER contacted Facebook about the court order, but it refused to comment. We are awaiting responses from some of the other companies cited in the ruling.

Update
Google responded to a request for comment, saying it has not been approached by the courts about this and can offer no comment at the moment. µ

Share this:

Comments
@bob...???

The judge is a US District judge (see, it says it right there in the article). That means he has jurisdiction over the entire US, not just Nevada. Google and the other companies mentioned are US based, so it follows that he has jurisdiction over them. What these companies do with their business in other countries (the rest of the globe) remains to be seen. If these companies have any common sense (and I suspect they do in this matter), they will apply this order to their over seas business as well, since it is only the right thing to do.

posted by : Ted, 30 November 2011 Complain about this comment
Judge oversteps jurisdiction

How it can be that a Nevada judge suddenly has jurisdiction over the entire planet is a mystery. I suspect that his "order" will be easily, and swiftly, quashed.

posted by : bob, 30 November 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?