DISK DRIVE MAKER Western Digital has been ordered to pay $525m by an arbitrator regarding claims made by rival storage outfit Seagate.
Seagate alleged that Western Digital and one of Seagate's former employees had misappropriated confidential information and trade secrets. The arbitrator in the case rendered the award of $525m against Western Digital, an assessment that Western Digital claims lacks any basis in law.
John Coyne, president and CEO of Western Digital said, "We do not believe there is any basis in law or fact for the damage award of the arbitrator." Coyne continued, "We believe the company acted properly at all times and we will vigorously challenge the award. This does not affect our ability to conduct our operations, to complete the recovery and recommencement of our Thailand operations or, subject to obtaining the required regulatory approvals, to consummate our planned acquisition of Hitachi GST."
Western Digital and Seagate recently announced that they will buy Hitachi GST and Samsung's hard drive operations, respectively. The moves will see the two firms duking it out, with Toshiba a very distant third place.
The fact that Coyne mentioned the Hitachi GST merger shows how important it is for the firm to complete the deal. If it falls through and Seagate completes its purchase of Samsung's hard drive division, Western Digital might be left at a disadvantage for competing with Seagate.
At present the hard disk drive industry has been reeling from the devastating floods in Thailand. With suppliers being forced to shutter factories, disk drive prices have increased sharply, though in recent days some models have started to slowly come down in price. µ
Tags: Hardware
Jobs
The hard disks, esp. the latest ones, are going to die quite faster than previous generations, no matter who manufactured them. NEVER trust a single storage media. I have several multi-TB RAID configurations where I have mixed the make and models of the drives to offset any possible batch/model defects (remember 7200.11?), RAID6 mode, etc. Overblown? No, hardly. Better safe than sorry.
I have had 60 hard drives, only 3 have failed, WD, I love my seagates.
If Samsung was buying Seagate, WD might have something to worry about. Since it's the other way round, There's not much to worry about. Samsung drives will probably wind up being the same slow, shoddy devices Seagate is putting out. I've NEVER had a Seagate drive last much longer than it's warranty period. I still have a couple WD drives pushing 8 years old in operation. My Dell notebook came with one of Seagate's 500GB 7200rpm offerings. Well it quickly got replaced with a WD drive, 750GB, 5400rpm, that provides better transfer speeds than the "faster" seagate.
You get what you pay for.. There's a reason Seagate drives are generally cheaper than equivalent Western Digital drives. Key word... CHEAPER!
From personal experience, Seagate=Garbage and not worth my time or money. This merger goes through.. Good bet I'll be adding Samsung drives to the garbage list as well. Then again, I might get surprised. Maybe Seagate will learn something from Samsung and improve their product. (I'm not holding my breath on that thought.)
LoCatus