The Inquirer-Home

Google's Schmidt slams proposed US online copyright legislation

Fears internet censorship
Wed Nov 16 2011, 12:40

PROPOSED LEGISLATION in the US to impose online copyright enforcement has been slammed by Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who said the bills would lead to censorship of the internet.

The legislation is called the PROTECT IP Act in the US Senate and the Stop Online Piracy Act in the US House of Representatives.

The two bills, intended to combat copyright infringement of movies and music, propose that copyright holders and law enforcement be given added powers to blacklist web sites. Search engines, payment collectors and others would also be required to block access to accused web sites.

According to Reuters, Schmidt said during an appearance at the MIT Sloan School of Management that the proposed solutions are "draconian". He added, "There's a bill that would require [internet service providers] to remove URLs from the Web, which is also known as censorship last time I checked."

But this doesn't mean Schmidt is a fan of copyright infringement. Hollywood studios have a legitimate problem, Schmidt was careful to add, as increasing trading of illegally copied movies threatens their revenue.

He said, "Their business models are threatened by theft. We don't endorse it. Please don't do it. If you're doing it, stop. I hope that's very clear."

The Google CEO recommended regulations based on tracing payments made to web sites offering illegal copies of copyrighted materials.

A group of companies including Google, AOL, Ebay, Facebook, Yahoo and Twitter have already written to lawmakers to oppose the bills. They said the measures are a "serious risk" to the industry's "innovation and job creation" as well as to US cyber security.

In the UK, a "traffic lights" system has been proposed as part of industry measures to discourage copyright infringement.

Frances Lowe, director of regulatory and corporate affairs at the Performing Rights Society for Music said at a Westminster e-forum that traffic lights could create the distinction between licensed and unlicensed content and tell the user if a web site is "rogue" before they click on it.

Google has disagreed with the traffic lights idea, saying that it would want to work with rights holders to promote "good" web sites instead. µ

Share this:

Comments
A Donkey's Donkey?

Did you mean to call him a Donkey's Donkey? Ass is short for Equus Africanus Asinus.

Presumably you meant Arse which has an entirely more appropriate meaning...

posted by : TDR, 17 November 2011 Complain about this comment
DONKEYS A$$

CENSORSHIP IS WHEN YOU HAVE THIS ONE IDEA THAT SOME PEOPLE HATE AND WHICH GETS SUPPRESSED AND YOURE NOT ALLOWED TO TELL PEOPLE ABOUT IT AND YOU GET JAILED IF YOU TRY. ITS ALSO KNOWN BY BOOK BURNING, WHERE THEY WOULD ALSO LIKE TO HEAP THE AUTHOR ON TOP OF THE BURNING PILE.

NOW IF YOU STEAL SOMEBODY ELSES IDEA AND TRY TO GIVE IT AWAY OR BETTER YET SELL IT FOR YOUR OWN PROFIT, AND YOU GET STOPPED THAT ISNT "CENSORSHIP", THAT IS CALLED "PROTECTING PROPERTY RIGHTS".

GUY IS A COMPLETE DONKEYS A$$, HEE-HAW. OR ANOTHER FILTHY THIEF.

posted by : SHOUTER, 16 November 2011 Complain about this comment
go_ogle recently embedded into Filesonic,

and several other file hosting sites to run their captcha. So go_ogle now has a direct interest in copyright infringement for getting eyes on their ads, and they also learn your taste in, ahem, movies. All accesses are tagged with your IP address and browser header, collated along with all of other online activities that they track, sites visited and search terms, and packaged into a personality profile for sale to anyone, especially gov't.

go_ogle is NOT giving you services, they're selling YOU.

posted by : bigger_luddite, 16 November 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?