The Inquirer-Home

Android 2.3 Gingerbread overtakes Android 2.2 Froyo

It's been a while
Fri Nov 04 2011, 17:26

SOFTWARE GIANT Google's Android 2.3 Gingerbread has, at long last, over taken Android 2.2 Froyo to be the most used version of the operating system.

It has taken almost a year since its launch but Android 2.3 Gingerbread is now the version of Android that most users are on. The latest figures show that across all its editions, 2.3 to 2.3.7, it accounts for 44.4 per cent of Android devices.

Android 2.2 Froyo was in the lead for what seemed like forever but is now behind at 40.7 per cent. Whilst some smartphones have come pre-loaded with a form of Gingerbread, many have been put on the market with Froyo and a promise of an update.

Android Version Share

This is true for phones such as the LG Optimus 2X and Optimus 3D for which LG is finally rolling out an update this month. The firm didn't want to delay getting the handsets on the shelves by opting for Gingerbread.

Android 3.0 to 3.2 Honeycomb, which is made specifically for tablets, is loaded on just 1.9 per cent of Android devices. We're somewhat astonished to report that a total of 13 per cent of users are still on Android versions that predate Froyo.

The next version of Android, 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, is almost out so we wonder how long it will take for it to overtake Gingerbread and Honeycomb. This version is designed for smartphones and tablets but new devices are still predominantly being announced and shipped with Android 2.3 Gingerbread, such as the Motorola Xoom 2 tablet. µ

Share this:

Comments
WHEN for the HTC Desire?

That's what I want to know!

posted by : Lovely Liam, 25 December 2011 Complain about this comment
Hacker's delight

Another way of looking at this report is that it tells those with malicious intent some useful information.

1) The likely lifetime of exploitable bugs

2)The proportion of the overall Android market in which which any given exploit will operate.

So, everything they need to decide whether any particular attack is likely to be profitable and long lasting.

For example, a bug in 2.3 and earlier would seem to be almost universally exploitable and will probably work for a long time to come.

Personally speaking I find that all quite unsettling.

posted by : bazza, 06 November 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?