I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it - Mae West
|
|
|
Ceglia claims Zuckerberg deleted Facebook emails
FACEBOOK CHANCER Paul Ceglia is now claiming that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg deleted emails relating to the dispute over whether Ceglia owns a significant chunk of the social network.
Ceglia is pursuing a lawsuit against Zuckerberg claiming that a 2003 contract signed by the pair of them entitles Ceglia to a large stake in Facebook, a share that would be worth billions. Now Ceglia is claiming that Zuckerberg deleted emails related to the lawsuit.
Zuckerberg and Facebook have maintained that Ceglia's lawsuit amounts to little more than fraud, though the firm does acknowledge that Zuckerberg and Ceglia did enter an agreement on another project, Streetfax. According to Ceglia, this agreement included a clause that would entitle him to be Zuckerberg's Facebook business partner.
Ceglia has requested the court to issue an order prohibiting Facebook or Zuckerberg from disputing the authenticity of his emails. Effectively, he's asking the court to validate the integrity of his evidence.
Orin Snyder, a lawyer for Zuckerberg and Facebook told Bloomberg, "These filings by Ceglia and his latest lawyer are truly delusional ... These are the desperate acts of a man whose fraudulent lawsuit has now been fully exposed."
Ceglia has had three lawyers withdraw in his quest for Facebook, which tends to suggest that the case he is bringing against Zuckerberg is flimsy at best. µ
Tags: Software
Share this:
Share
Hey thanks for the links dude, I took a look and this guy Ceglia has a good case in my opinion. All I have seen in media is how this guy is a con artist and fled to Ireland because he was lying, but after looking at his lawyers site, their evidence is pretty strong especially the evidence presented by Jerry Grant, untill now i never seen grants evidence, which is remarkable because the media should be reporting this, this seems like a case of smear the small guy and favour the big business like facebook, bias on the part of the media in my opinion,. I HOPE THIS GUY GETS JUSTICE AND GETS HIS RIGHTFUL SHARE OF FACEBOOK ZUCKERBERG SCAMMED BEFORE HE COULD DO IT AGAIN
I have being following this story since the start and have seen a lot of evidence on Ceglias side which is not being broadcasted because it is damning to FB. Why isnt the expert views in favour of Ceglia who all agree Ceglia's evidence is authentic? .Lets take this simple fact of email preservation, Ceglia and Zuckerberg used a program called Webmail to email eachother and anyone with any computer knowledge knows that Webmail deletes sent email in order to avoid exceeding storage limits. So according to Ceglia he copied the headers and texts of these emails into word documents in 03-04 in order to not loose them by leaving them in Webmail to be deleted at a later date and put them on floppy discs..comouter forensic expert Jerry Gran after analyzing them says they are consistent with how Ceglia says he copied and saved them here is a link to Ceglias Lawyers website it contains grants evidence along with others and i have to say its quite convincing http://bolandlegal.com/site/ceglia-emails-to-zuckerberg-are-authentic-and-they-are-blockbusters .. Ther is much more evidence you just have to look at the facts,, unfortunately the media is refusing to report such facts. Or what about Michael McGowans biased analysis of Ceglias computer, at while ago McGowan outlined a framework on how to find out the authencity of such things, he used them on Ceglias computer but refused to use the same framework when analysing the computers of Zuckerberg