The Inquirer-Home

Apple rejects Samsung's Galaxy Tab offer

Not nearly enough
Tue Oct 04 2011, 11:16

SELLER OF SHINY TOYS Apple has rejected Samsung's offer to settle a dispute over the sale of Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablets in Australia.

Samsung attempted to appease Apple by altering some features that allegedly infringe Apple patents, and hoped that would result in lifting a sales injunction in an Australian court. However Apple rejected the offer and said it was simply out to stop the Galaxy Tab 10.1 from ever seeing the light of day in Australia.

Steven Burley, Apple's lawyer told the court, "The main reason we are here is to prevent the [Galaxy Tab 10.1] launch and maintain the status quo."

Apple won an injunction to stop Samsung from selling its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet in Australia, however yesterday Samsung offered an olive branch, claiming it had altered some of the features that Apple has alleged infringed its patents. Samsung's changes mean that the dispute now covers three alleged patent infringements.

Neil Young, Samsung's lawyer told Reuters that if a decision couldn't be reached by mid-October then the firm was in no hurry. "If we can't get a decision out by mid-October, there is no urgency," said Young, adding that if Samsung couldn't get a decision by then, the device's Australian market would be "commercially dead".

Apple's candid admission in court that it wants to "maintain the status quo" could be seen as simply keeping devices that might pose a significant challenge to the Ipad away from the market. There's no doubt that Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 launch in Australia has been severely damaged by the legal wrangling, but the Korean company has a bigger hurdle coming up next week when a US court is expected to deliver its verdict in a similar case. µ

Share this:

Comments
Dr. McCoy called

Yo Apple, Dr. McCoy called from 1966, he's suing you for stealing his tablet as a 'work of art"

posted by : Mahhn, 04 October 2011 Complain about this comment
...

From CRN Tech:

"That left three patents on the table for argument today. They covered the manufacture of a capacitive touch screen used in the iPad 2 and Galaxy Tab 10.1 (2005246219), selective rejection of inadvertent finger movements on a touch screen (2008258177) and a heuristics patent used to correct a user's finger movements when scrolling vertically on a screen (2007286532)."

I'm not sure exactly what the first one is about - does it mean Samsung aren't allowed to use capacitative screens at all, or just certain types? The other two are trivial to the point of being laughable. If these are the lengths Apple has to go to to "compete" then they're pathetic. Then again, it doesn't surprise me that they're succeeding in Australia - the land of topsy-turvy laws.

posted by : H. Ruiz, 04 October 2011 Complain about this comment
What were the changes ?

Maybe one of these "articles" could explain what changes were proposed by Samsung, and what the other offending similarities are ?

posted by : KBob, 04 October 2011 Complain about this comment
Here's a suggestion...

Samsung should just abandon the Galaxy Tab line of products in Australia... and reintroduce it as the Galaxy Pad line... with eg slightly less curvy corners and different shape button in the front (like the Galaxy S2)... and maybe with a power-led in the middle or around it. That way it would officially be a completely different product with no relation tot he ban on the Galaxy Tab line :-) Maybe...

posted by : Martin5000, 04 October 2011 Complain about this comment
*VERY* *ANGRIFICATORY*

*...* *NUFF* *SAID*

posted by : STAR SHOUTER, 04 October 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?