The Inquirer-Home

Onstar will sell its users' driving data

Changes T&Cs for the worse
Wed Sep 21 2011, 11:53

AUTOMOBILE MONITORING SERVICE Onstar has changed its terms and conditions to give it the right to pass on information about its customers to law enforcement agencies and others.

The firm, which is part of General Motors, has been sending its customers notification of a change to their T&C's that one user said includes some "unsettling updates".

"OnStar's latest T&Cs has some very unsettling updates to it, which include the ability to sell your personal GPS location information, speed, safety belt usage, and other information to third parties, including law enforcement," writes hacker, author and scientist Jonathan Zdziarski.

"To add insult to a slap in the face, the company insists they will continue collecting and selling this personal information even after you cancel your service, unless you specifically shutdown the data connection to the vehicle after canceling."

The post was noticed by F-Secure's Mikko Hypponen, who has pegged this as an information disclosure episode to watch. "Tip of the day: follow @OnStar to see how well they are able to do PR damage control. #GPSGate #BringThePopCorn," tweeted the security pro.

Although Onstar has promised that it will sell the data only anonymously, this is perhaps the most controversial part of the arrangement.

"Anonymized GPS data? There's no such thing! We've all seen this before - anonymized searches, for example, that were not-so-quite anonymized. But in this case, it's impossible to anonymize GPS data!", added Zdziarski. "If your vehicle is consistently parked at your home, driving down your driveway, or taking a left or right turn onto your street, its pretty obvious that this is where you live!"

We've seen this before, of course. In April 2011 Tomtom admitted inadvertently giving Dutch police data collected from its devices in order to set speed traps. It was quite some mistake, and quite the PR disaster.

"It turns out the police have used traffic information that you have helped to create to place speed cameras where the average speed is higher than the legally allowed speed limit. We did not foresee in this type of usage," said the firm in an apologetic blog post.

"TomTom fully understands some of customers do not like this and we will amend the licensing conditions to stop this type of usage in near future."

Onstar has responded to criticism, but merely told users that it was important to inform them about the changes.

"At OnStar, we are sensitive to our customers' privacy and are committed to be transparent in our business practices. Therefore, it was important to us to inform existing subscribers in the United States and Canada of these changes, which will go into effect Dec. 1, 2011," it said, claiming that it would use the extra information to provide better service.

Although it did not comment on selling data to third parties it did try to explain why it will continue to monitor vehicles even after a customer cancelled an agreement with it.

"Some of the key changes made to the Terms and Conditions relate to the provision that, in case a customer chooses to cancel the OnStar Services, we will maintain the two-way connection with the vehicle and may continue to collect data unless instructed otherwise by the customer," it explained.

Onstar will explain further in a web cast set for later this week. µ

Share this:

Comments
HAL lives

Dave, I'm afraid I can't keep law enforcement from tracking your speed or tracking your movements.......Best reason so far to drive an OLD car....tech is neutral but some of its users are EVIL.

posted by : DeniseJ, 23 September 2011 Complain about this comment
One of these days

Somebody is going to be fed up enough with all these liberal, one-sided changes to Ts&Cs and challenge them in court.
Personally, if I was an OnStar client I do believe that I would do just that.
As far as I am concerned, a contract is a legally binding agreement between two parties, and any changes have to be agreed on by both parties. That is what my law professor told me at school.
Why is it that a company can unilaterally decide to totally change the user conditions in such a user-defavorable way ?
Maybe users should notify OnStar that they also change the T&Cs to withhold payment until this situation is rectified.
But of course that won't happen. It is so much easier to be sheep.

posted by : Pascal Monett, 22 September 2011 Complain about this comment
OnStar Statement

We value our customers’ privacy and security and have never sold any personally identifiable information to any third party. To be clear and transparent regarding our business practices we have put together the video below.

http://bit.ly/onstarTandC

posted by : Ryan for OnStar, 21 September 2011 Complain about this comment
Duh

Anyone out there seen that Progressive insurance commercial where you can have the little "safe driver" monitor installed? OnStar has the sensors already, and gives it to insurance companies. You have no choice to opt out. So if your acceleration / deceleration is above a threshold, the info gets logged and passed on. Speed and GPS comes in real handy to know if you are a speeder.

posted by : Hucklebuck, 21 September 2011 Complain about this comment
HAHAHA

What they are making it official now? They have been doing this already I bet. But now they have to account for it in the books. Cities and states looking to make extra cash are looking at places where they can lower the speed limit by 5 to 10 miles per hour and then make a killing with easy cash.

They find where speeding is occurring most frequently then go in and lower the posted speed limit by 5 to 10 depending on how bad the budget looks and write a ton of tickets and "fix the budget. Hell they do this already but armed with this info make the job so much easier.

posted by : Bill, 21 September 2011 Complain about this comment
GM is off my shopping list

As far as I am concerned, no GM vehicle will ever be bought by my family again, ever. I'm sick to death of being spied upon and treated like a commodity to be sold to the highest bidder. It's bad enough when the Government does it. I'm not going to tolerate it from soulless, evil Corporations.

posted by : Morely the IT Guy, 21 September 2011 Complain about this comment
DeathStar

That just killed hundreds of sales I bet.

posted by : Andrew, 21 September 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?