UK CITIZENS are becoming increasingly vocal about the number of spam text messages that they receive, according to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).
The commissioner's office fielded just over 618 complaints about unrequested marketing messages between April 2010 and April this year, according to a report at the BBC, and it said that these figures are perhaps just the tip of the iceberg. Since April the number of complaints has almost doubled, to 1,008 complaints received, it adds.
Spam messages are advertising sent to you although you did not request them. How this differs from the constant stream of advertising we are subjected to is probably for marketing professors to say, but for now we can tell you that they are annoying and are on the ICO's radar.
Unfortunately, while we find the difference confusing, so does the ICO find their legality a beguiling issue.
"The reason that people do this is to make money," said the ICO's Simon Entwhistle. "They send out text messages using sophisticated computer equipment buying untraceable SIM cards. If they send out 100 texts and one person replies that's some money made for them. They can sell that one claim on, times that by a million they can make a lot of money out of this business."
Unfortunately sending out spam texts is not a criminal offence, and for now the best advice coming out of the ICO is that you should not share your mobile phone number too often and not reply to any unsolicited text messages. µ
A couple of years ago, I was getting 8 spam texts *per second*, which made even dialing an outbound call impossible. I used a landline to call my cell carrier and demand that they stop the spams. They claimed they couldn't do it. I then demanded that they shut off SMS service on my number, and they claimed they couldn't do that, either. I then pointed out that, since they could not deliver the service they had sold me (cellular *telephone* service) due to the unusable number being slammed by SMS at that rate, I was now free to go to another carrier without paying an early termination fee. Suddenly, they were magically able to turn off SMS for my number. I haven't missed it.
Keep in mind this is in the USA, where each incoming text message costs 25 cents; I was getting 2 dollars per second stolen from me. The carrier reluctantly agreed to waive those charges, as well.
I haven't shared my Virgin mobile number with anyone or any organisation, and I still get texts telling me that the "accident" I had would be worth claiming for if I use the services of the shysters sending the spam. Aren't they just doing a dictionary attack on mobile numbers, and not even bothering harvesting them from websites or social media? Can the mobile companies not identify spammers as easily as ISP's and turn them off?