The Inquirer-Home

Intel gives a first glimpse of its Medfield Android tablet

IDF 2011 Working Android 3.x Honeycomb device
Wed Sep 14 2011, 01:14

CHIPMAKER Intel showed off its own-brand tablet with its Atom 'Medfield' chip at the Intel Developer Forum today.

intel-medfield-android-tablet-google-honeycomb

The INQUIRER got a close-up view of Intel's Medfield tablet "form factor reference design", which was running on its 32nm Atom Medfield processor. The device has a 10.1in screen and was shown off running Android 3.x Honeycomb.

Other than getting a brief look at it, we didn't get to find out much about the tablet. Intel said it is 8.9mm thick and is running "alpha software" at present that is in an optimisation phase.

Steve Smith, VP of notebooks and tablets at Intel said, "This is the kind of thing we use to qualify the SoC (system on chip) and to work with the software developers to get the operating system up, running and optimised to do performance analysis and then to provide a baseline that OEMs (original equipment manufacturer) can use to go to production."

intel-medfield-android-tablet-google

"World's first Intel x86 based Android tablet", Smith added.

There were a couple of devices working that had a few functioning apps. From a brief demonstration the performance looked very smooth.

Earlier in Paul Otellini's keynote a Medfield smartphone was very briefly shown with Android Gingerbread on it when Andy Rubin from Google was on stage announcing the partnership between the two IT industry giants. µ

Share this:

Comments
App Performance?

So will apps have to be native x86 and, therefore, require separate downloads and vendor builds or will they run on an ARM emulator and be sluggish?

BTW, @SHOUTER, Samsung get CPUs "at cost" too: ARM license fee is almost nothing per chip and Samsung make their own ARM chips.

posted by : Paula Frou, 14 September 2011 Complain about this comment
Gimme An A/B Test

It would be interesting to compare two tablets, side-by-side, both running Android, one with the usual ARM CPU inside, the other with x86. How would the respective performance and battery life measure up? Not to mention cost.

I suspect the verdict would not be flattering to Intel…

posted by : Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 14 September 2011 Complain about this comment
NICE

SINCE THEY GET THE CPU "AT COST" THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO HANDILY UNDERCUT ALL THEIR CUSTOMERS.

posted by : SHOUTER, 14 September 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?