The Inquirer-Home

EU Council votes to extend copyright to 70 years

Record labels continue to rake in cash
Tue Sep 13 2011, 12:09

THE EUROPEAN UNION Council has voted to extend the copyright on sound recordings from 50 to 70 years.

According to the BBC, the decision to extend copyright laws follows a campaign by recording artists who said they should continue to earn money from their creations.

However, it is the big music recording labels that will really benefit from the extension, as well as the bigger artists such as U2's Bono or mums' favourite, Cliff Richard.

This is because the change applies to the copyright on studio recordings, often owned by the record labels, rather than the rights to the composition that is owned by the songwriters.

The 50 year rule would have seen the copyright on tunes by The Beatles, the Rolling Stones and The Who expire in the next few years, meaning anyone could use the songs how they wanted. This could have seen some very bad covers and advert themes but at least the record labels would have ceased to receive royalties.

Rolling Stone Mick Jagger told the BBC that the European Union's decision was "obviously advantageous" to musicians.

"Obviously the record business is not what it was, so people don't earn as much as they used to," he said. "[The royalties] can extend their lives and the lives of their families who inherit their songs."

The European Union Council said, "Performers generally start their careers young and the current term of protection of 50 years often does not protect their performances for their entire lifetime. Therefore, some performers face an income gap at the end of their lifetimes."

Jim Killock, executive director of consumer organisation the Open Rights Group, told the BBC there was "never any evidence it was going to do any good".

He said, "It puts money into the pockets of big labels. It's unlikely to benefit smaller artists and it will mean that a lot of sound recordings that are out of print will stay out of print."

Last week, a last ditch attempt was made by a Pirate Party member of the European Parliament to block the plans to extend copyright on creative works from 50 to 70 years.

Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Luxembourg, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden and the Netherlands were in opposition to the proposal. µ

Share this:

Comments
Reneging On The Deal

Copyright is supposed to be a two-way street. As an agreement between the Creator and Society, the Creator publishes the work for Society to enjoy, but in return the Creator is granted monopoly rights, for a limited time, in order to derive profit from such enjoyment. After that, the Work falls into the Public Domain, for anybody to use as they see fit.

Cliff Richard knew what the deal was when he released his first song back in the 1950s. I don’t recall him registering any protest at the time, therefore we must assume he willingly agreed to the terms.

Yet here we are now, and they are unilaterally repudiating what was already agreed to, and trying to retroactively force us into a new deal. Why should we agree? What are the odds that the new deal won’t also be casually cast aside when the time comes?

This whole sorry saga has completely destroyed any moral justification for copyright. It’s all about greed, pure and simple.

posted by : Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 14 September 2011 Complain about this comment
Denial does not change reality

Buy a clue and pay for music or software. Pay me now or pay dearly later. One way or the other you will pay.

posted by : Boris, 14 September 2011 Complain about this comment
Insane

Corporations have just got the okay to keep raping the public until they die!!

posted by : Brent, 14 September 2011 Complain about this comment
As it should be

The only ones stealing are pirates and that is why they are being prosecuted. Nothing in this world is free. If you want it you pay for it or do without.

posted by : Paul, 13 September 2011 Complain about this comment
Stealing your culture

The idea behind copyrights is to ensure that society benefits from the culture of it's people. Give your people some monopoly stake for a period of time and they continue to create. But, that's is only because what they create is your culture. Extend copyright and your culture is stays stagnant. Copyright is about the people and culture not about monopoly status.

Time for you all to elect some new leaders and change your laws to make it criminal to lobby paid public officials--at any level.

posted by : Jim B., 13 September 2011 Complain about this comment
surprised?

whats that you say?!
politicians passing laws that make big corporations richer?!

surely that doesnt happen all the time?

.....sorry, ive been under a rock for 20 years...

posted by : anthony pilkington-smythe, 13 September 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?