
The only problem [Nvidia has] is that at some point your eyes don't get any better - Bob Colwell, former chief architect, Intel
UK NEWS OUTLET The Guardian was forced to close a special Twitter account it set up for reporting the 10-year anniversary of the September 11 attacks after it caused outrage on the micro-blogging network.
The account @911tenyearsago barely lasted an hour before the Guardian cancelled it, with just 16 tweets of the many hundreds it clearly had planned. The idea was to cover "the events of 9/11, tweeted as they happened in 2001."
We could have told The Guardian that was a bad idea right from the start, but it found out very quickly after tweeting about the hijacking of Flight 11, Flight 77 and Flight 175, including disturbing quotations from flight attendants.
The social backlash at Twitter was swift, with many people labeling the tweets as "bad taste", "morbid", "a bad idea", "a bit weird tbh, almost eerie", and "a bit sick".
The key to the upset that the Guardian's tweets caused can be found in one user's tweet: "Sorry, Guardian, but @911tenyearsago doesn't feel right to me. There's a difference between remembering and reliving."
While many news sources have shown extensive footage of the 9/11 attacks, often in distressing detail, that's a little different from launching a special Twitter account just to recount, and indeed relive, those events minute by minute, as if they were just happening.
The Guardian swiftly realised it had made a mistake, tweeting "This account of the events is now ending", but it never made an apology to anyone who might have been offended.
In 2001 Twitter did not exist. If it had, many people likely would have found out about those terrible events as they happened via tweets. Even though 10 years have passed, memories are still very raw, and news organisations must be more responsible than the Guardian was in this instance. µ
Tags: Internet
I know fox replayed thier entire coverage on foxnews.com at least, as it happened on 9/11. and my guess is most networks did the something similar.
Another reason it's a mistake: WHY the HELL would britain give a damn?
I think at this point 9/11 is a reminder that the terrorist had a point all along and that bush and blair andsoforth proved that, which to me is a bit painful and so etched in my mind that I do not need reminding really (even as a third party).
I'd describe 9/11 as the glass jaw of the US that broke from a single punch, and then made them take off their mask, and boy it wasn't pretty to see the real face.
In 1979 and/or 1989, I think it was, BBC TV broadcast television news bulletins as from late August and early September 1939, the Nazi invasion of Poland and the beginning of the Second World War. I don't think people were particularly offended by it.
And I bet someone's tweeting binladen10yearsago right now. Or gwbush10yearsago. "met a nice indian lady who said good idea to be out of town next couple days didn't say why but better safe than sorry lol"