The Inquirer-Home

Android update will save Samsung from Apple's claws

Apple's 'win' was actually a major loss
Thu Aug 25 2011, 12:55

AN ANDROID UPDATE to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones should protect the Korean firm from a preliminary injunction issued by a Dutch court at Apple's request.

Yesterday The INQUIRER reported that Apple had won an injunction barring Samsung from selling some of its Galaxy smartphones in Europe.

However, it is likely that an update from Android 2.1 to Android 2.3 will resolve the patent issue, which concerns the way photos are viewed on a touchscreen.

According to OS news, only the Gallery application infringes the patent in question, and Samsung has confirmed it will update the software to get around the problem.

"The injunction has been granted due to the method of scrolling in the Gallery. If that's replaced, there is no more reason to uphold the injunction," said Bas Berghuis van Woortman, one of Samsung's lawyers.

The injunction doesn't come into effect until mid-October, giving the Korean phone maker plenty of time to change the software.

OS news points to evidence showing that although Apple entered into battle with three patents and a community design, all but the Gallery patent were thrown out by the judge.

The swipe-to-unlock patent will likely be declared invalid, the judge wrote, specifically referring to the Neonode N1m mobile phone as prior art, which has the exact same unlock method as the Iphone.

Apple's complaint about the design of Galaxy smartphones was also thrown out, with the judge citing numerous cases of prior art, including the LG Prada. And in the case of the Android GUI patent, the judge cited the Nokia 7710 as prior art.

Although Samsung's PR firm in the UK hadn't heard anything about an Android update, Samsung said that it expects only the Netherlands to be affected by the ruling. It said, "[The] ruling is an affirmation that the GALAXY range of products is innovative and distinctive. With regard to the single infringement cited in the ruling, we will take all possible measures including legal action to ensure that there is no disruption in the availability of our GALAXY smartphones to Dutch consumers.

"This ruling is not expected to affect sales in other European markets. We will continue our plans to introduce new products and technologies that meet and exceed consumer expectations. And we will defend our intellectual property rights through the ongoing legal proceedings around the world."

So it seems that this time Apple ended up going one for four, and that one 'win' appears to be meaningless. Ouch. µ

Share this:

Comments
SHAMELESS THEFT

WELL, ANYBODY IS ALLOWED TO SHAMELESSLY STEAL GOOD IDEAS,
SO LONG AS THEY ARE NOT PATENT-PROTECTED THAT IS.

I THINK APPLE IS SMART TO PATENT ANY GOOD IDEA THEY DRUM UP.
DOING OTHERWISE IS JUST FOOLISH?

AND WHAT IN THE HELL IS THE SENSE OF SPENDING SHAREHOLDER MONEY ON PATENT PROTECTION, AND THEN NOT DEFENDING THAT PROPERTY?

IF I WERE SITTING ON THE BOARD, AND THE CEO WAS LIKE "NAW I'M NOT PROTECTING THOSE PATENTS WE BLEW ALL THAT CASH ON", YOU CAN BET THAT I'D BE ALL OVER GETTING HIM CANNED.

posted by : SHOUTER, 09 September 2011 Complain about this comment
Apple drinks it's own Poison

Steve Jobs Quote: "We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas" - interview for the PBS series Triumph of the Nerds

Shameless....

posted by : Samsung, 26 August 2011 Complain about this comment
Apple needs to grow up.

If you factor the negative PR this generated- It seems to me that apple really lost out. I refuse to buy any apple products out of principal.

Thanks for making the iPhone unappealing. Not only did you lose a customer, you made an enemy who wants to convince others to not buy your products.

posted by : viscountalpha, 26 August 2011 Complain about this comment
go Lg

Go after the rotten apple

posted by : hteles, 25 August 2011 Complain about this comment
Interesting

There's an interesting sub plot here:

LG have long protested the iPhone was a blatant rip off of the Prada, now a European judge seems to have indirectly ruled that to be the case.

Do LG now have a claim against Apple for slavishly copying their design?

posted by : LG_R_Cool, 25 August 2011 Complain about this comment
prior art?

Did the Treo 650's gallery not scroll in a similar fashion as the iPhone?

posted by : counsel, 25 August 2011 Complain about this comment
Wordperfect are kicking themselves

They should have sued Microsoft for copying their keyboard shortcuts in Word.

posted by : GW, 25 August 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?