The Inquirer-Home

Microsoft has issues with Google’s Motorola Android patents

Says Motorola is infringing its patents
Tue Aug 23 2011, 11:10

PATENTS BOUGHT BY Google along with Motorola to beat off lawsuits might be vulnerable to challenges by Microsoft.

Google by all accounts bought Motorola Mobility to pre-empt legal strikes from the Rockstar Consortium and its members firms as individuals. However, Microsoft lawyers are already in court arguing that Motorola's Android phones infringe its technology.

The life of a patent lawyer must be a good one. Not since we wore shorts and argued in playgrounds over who owned what football and who smelled worse than who have people been able to squabble so openly without shame.

Google has taken something of a high horse in its approach and explained that it only buys patents because everyone does, making us wonder whether it would jump off a cliff if everyone else did. But it might have bought a pup in the Motorola purchase.

Microsoft accused Motorola Mobility of infringing seven of its patents on Monday and called for a ban on imports to the US for some of its handsets, says Bloomberg. This would see US shoppers denied Motorola phones called the Droid 2, Droid X, Cliq XT, Devour, Backflip and Charm.

"We have a responsibility to our employees, customers, partners and shareholders to safeguard our intellectual property," David Howard, Microsoft's corporate VP and deputy general counsel for litigation said in an e-mail to Bloomberg. "Motorola is infringing our patents and we are confident that the ITC will rule in our favor."

Motorola Mobility, which has just gained a $12.5bn price tag thanks to Google, is keen to defend against the attacks, and a spokeswoman told Bloomberg that it had plans to buy its patent lawyers summer houses and new cars.

"We have also brought legal actions of our own in the U.S. and in Europe to address Microsoft's large scale of infringement of Motorola Mobility's patents."

Legal testimony in the case, heard for the first time yesterday, said that Motorola had infringed patents on functions close to Microsoft's heart.

These include, ooh, synchronising emails, and, gasp, displaying changes in battery charge level. µ

Share this:

Comments
If They Were To Jump Off A Cliff ...

... that would be fine. Google would just say “ta for killing your own chance of acquiring any market share”, and help its Android device makers take up the market shortfall.

The trouble is, what these rivals are doing is NOT jumping off a cliff, it’s throwing rocks down off the cliff at you. Not nice. So you have to set up your own cliff, above them, so you can use the threat of throwing patent rocks down on them to make them stop.

My fear is, what happens after that...

posted by : Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 24 August 2011 Complain about this comment
hehe

It's kinda funny. Now that there is no hope motorolla will do business with microsoft, out come the lawsuits.

I used to own a Motorolla Q, and windows mobile 5 device :-)

Certainly not alot of love between the big 3 these days.

posted by : Andrew, 24 August 2011 Complain about this comment
Pure garbage

Just two weeks ago Motorola was going to SUE other Android OEM's about Moto's patents.
/Get your facts straight

posted by : Adrian, 24 August 2011 Complain about this comment
...

"Google has taken something of a high horse in its approach and explained that it only buys patents because everyone does, making us wonder whether it would jump off a cliff if everyone else did."

Google choice is either to jump or to get thrown off the cliff. By jumping they still got a chance to hit the water.
(Considering that Google didn't sue anyone over patents yet and only got sued)

posted by : Anonymous, 23 August 2011 Complain about this comment
how evil of them

No microsoft, apple and facebook.. evil forces of internet and online world.

posted by : mark, 23 August 2011 Complain about this comment
MicroSue

How much better the world would be without Microsoft in it.

Here's hoping that Microsoft dies some day..... SOON.

posted by : Michael, 23 August 2011 Complain about this comment
Lawyer win/win

Some of these awarded patents are so vague a good lawyer could accuse my grandmother's knitting technique to be infringing on carbon sheet patents owned by the Detroit Redwings. He'd probably win too.

posted by : Someone Special, 23 August 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?