SOFTWARE DEVELOPER Microsoft has found itself accused of owing an Xbox Live user $500bn.
David Stebbins, a chap who has filed several lawsuits against big businesses over the past year, has taken Microsoft to court alleging that by changing the terms of an Xbox Live contract that both he and Microsoft agreed to, Microsoft now owes him $500bn. Stebbins filed a motion with a Seattle federal court on Monday in a bid to confirm the exorbitant arbitration award.
It's no surprise to hear that Stebbins is representing himself and he told the Seattle PI that his ploy of changing the terms of the Xbox Live contract he had entered with Microsoft was exactly the same one used by firms against their customers. Stebbins claims that Microsoft never got back to him within the 24 hour period he gave it to accept arbitration of his contract change demands.
In an email interview with the Seattle PI he defended the fact that he has sued a number of companies in the past year, saying, "In fact, I see a lot of friends and family who get pushed around and walked on, who have causes of action against them, but they choose not to pursue those causes of action. Lots of people are victims of torts ... few of them actually sue over them, but that doesn't mean they can't."
Stebbins' claims might be frivolous but he does have a point about contracts seemingly being one-sided against consumers. Everyone has read the clause that stipulates that the terms of a contract can be changed at any time, and as Stebbins has shown, why shouldn't the consumer, a legal entity in a contract, be the one to change the terms?
Of course it is highly unlikely that Stebbins will ever see his claimed $500bn, but at least he has shown that consumers can fight big companies at their own games from time to time. µ
Tags: Microsoft
Lets be glad he's doing this in Seattle, so we don't have to grant the idiot legal aid.
You can't have your court privilages revoked Ken.
Besides, if court privilages could be revoked for bring frivious lawsuits before the court Microsoft's would have been revoked ages ago.
Congrats on completely missing the point!
Something along the lines of 10,000$ USD or even 100,000$ usd would of been enough. 500bn just sounds like he is an attention whore.
"HAY EVERYONE LOOK AT ME! I'M AN ATTENTION WHORE WHOSE LOOKING LIKE I'M TRYING TO FIGHT BACK!"
Yeah, right...
When Microsoft changes the terms of the contract, you can chose to stop using the service (yes, you can debate whether or not that means you should get your money back).
When Frivolous Idiot changes the terms of the contract, Microsoft can chose to stop providing the service to him.
End of story. Frivolous Idiot is soon going to find his court privileges revoked.
"Stop clogging our courts with frivolous lawsuits. Some people have way too much time on their hands."
Says you! The only thing frivolous here is being able to change the contract in the first place without the other party agreeing to it.
The more free time this David Stebbins character has on his hands the better. Only when bad laws start costing big business $$$ will government actually look into fixing it.
Some people have too much time, and some people are actually prepared to make a stand against corporate bullies.
The Law is there to protect the interests of both parties.
Clogging our courts with frivolous lawsuits. Some people have way too much time on their hands