CHIP DESIGNER AMD has ruled out making a move in the smartphone market, preferring to concentrate on tablets.
Rick Bergman, SVP and GM of AMD's products group told a conference that the chip designer has no plans to get into the smartphone market, saying that its expertise in graphics does not suit that market. Instead it will be up to AMD's Z-series embedded chip to push X86 into the tablet market.
Bergman told the crowd "We haven't announced any plans to go in that handheld space. We've got plenty of opportunities... in server, notebook and now tablets, that's our immediate focus. But if the right circumstances come up and we can see a way to impact the market, we'll obviously continue to look."
AMD's decision to leave the smartphone market alone is an interesting one. It once again raises the question of whether X86 system-on-chip (SoC) designs are profitable.
Intel is trying extremely hard to put its Atom processor into smartphones and believes it can do so, but realistically it will at least need to use its 22nm Tri-gate process node in order to bring power consumption down to the levels that are needed in the embedded market. And even that might not be enough, as Intel has publicly said it will need to go beyond Moore's Law for its Atom processor, which really means it needs a very mature 22nm process node or more likely 14nm scale to really hit the sub-1W thermal design power required.
AMD relies on others to punch out its chip designs, and we have heard a few stories that some fabs are having trouble with next generation process nodes. Our sources refer to the 28nm process node as being particularly tricky. We have also heard that companies that were expecting to release ARM-based SoC chips on a 28nm process node this year have put a "first half 2012" date on that.
Perhaps AMD believes its CPU and GPU combination APU chips are more suited to tablets where the power restrictions can be relaxed. The problem here is that once again ARM vendors such as Nvidia, Qualcomm and Texas Instruments already have the lion's share of that market and even Intel, not to mention AMD, will face an uphill battle to gain traction.
AMD might have been taking heat for not going into the smartphone market, but its decision not to step into the ring with the biggest chip vendors is prudent. There is a big question that even a company of Intel's size can break into the smartphone and tablet market, and AMD might have decided wisely that its money will be better spent on parts it believes will have a better chance of selling. µ
Using the new ultra thin hard drives AMD Fusion E450 makes a great thinbook.
They are already in the worlds best budget netbooks courtesy of Intel's restrictions on development of budget Atoms.
To my knowledge, we don’t have a way to benchmark an ARM-based CPU (+Adreno, or whatever GPU), against a Llano APU or an Atom.
I think it is fair to expect the ARM to have the highest efficiency, but can they compete, in raw performance, with x86?
I mean, put an E350 into a tablet. You can play most of the current games at HD-ready resolution, as it has been proved on notebooks like the HP DM1Z.
Put an AMD C50 there, and you get a very, very speedy APU for that power envelope: is there any ARM solution that can compete with a C-50?
Can you do this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1yFPGr3C4s on ARM’s platform?
By the time Arm-based solution can achieve that performance, where will x86 be?
Getting to the point: I’m sure that there could be a market for ARM-powered tablets. I can’t see though x86 being kicked out completely, on the contrary: how many will prefer to run Windows7 on their tablet?
Personally, I am waiting for a 11~12” pad, with a decent size hard drive (there are many 500GB HD in slim factors: 9mm thick) and a C-50. The Asus Eee Slate has an insanely expensive SSD, and only up to 64GB (with Windows 7 typically clogging up to 20GB), only 2GB of ram, and an expensive Core i5. This adds up to $1270. Why oh why?
It is pretty clear to me that for pure mobility, ARM is the choice. But if you need/like/want Windows, either Windows8 becomes efficient like Linux, or you’ll need a whole lot of ARM’s cores to get it running.
Also they seems acquiring Texas Instruments. And this RAM business they gotten into ... points precisely to below advice.
I told them 1.5 yers back:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1586050/global-foundries-goes-global
I guess just like Intel has started making SSDs. AMD should start making SSDs and now not just that but also RAMs and an Ambush on Intel... Camera Sensors too. imagine what could be done over already existing 25600-ISO.
See ...
Not As Dark As They Thought (scroll down to this section)
http://regex.info/blog/2008-09-15/935
Foxes in the dark with the NIKON D3
However, the fact the D3 could lock focus when I myself was even finding it hard to make out the foxes
http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/foxes/