The Inquirer-Home

Microsoft, EA and Sega get sued over alleged Kinect patent infringement

Taints Microsoft's success
Mon Jul 25 2011, 14:00

GAME CONSOLE VENDOR Microsoft and eight games publishers have been sued by a firm claiming that Microsoft's Kinect infringes some of its patents.

Microsoft's Kinect motion tracking system has been a sales success for the firm, garnering almost universal praise and helping the firm's Xbox division post a significant increase in revenue. However, Impulse Technology is claiming that Microsoft and some of the largest games publishers in the industry are infringing its patents that relate to motion tracking and gaming.

Impulse Technology claims it informed Microsoft of its patents, most of which are titled "System and method for tracking and assessing movement skills in multidimensional space" and seem to apply specifically to the domain of computer gaming. The patent applications were filed as far back as 1999 and, on the face of it, Microsoft might have to find a technicality in order to avoid paying royalties.

One of Impulse Technology's patents, patent number 6430997 granted 13 August 2002, claims, "The present invention provides a system for quantifying physical motion of a player or subject and providing feedback to facilitate training and athletic performance. A preferred system creates an accurate simulation of sport to quantify and train several novel performance constructs by employing: sensing electronics (preferably optical sensing electronics as discussed below) for determining, in essentially real time, the player's three dimensional positional changes in three or more degrees of freedom (three dimensions); and computer controlled sport specific cuing that evokes or prompts sport specific responses from the player."

With a patent like that and others of similar description, you can understand why Impulse Technology believes it has a case against Microsoft. If the company can make its claims stick then it could be in line to receive a boat load of cash.

As if going after Microsoft was not hard enough, Impulse Technology also cited Electronics Arts, Konami and Sega among eight games publishers that it claims infringed its patents. In the world of superfluous patent damage claims, Impulse Technology wants "permanent injunction, damages, treble damages, interest, attorneys' fees and costs". We ask, why stop at treble damages? Why not ask for a lifetime supply of beer while you are at it?

Microsoft has yet to comment on the allegations but, as it is no stranger to patent litigation, we're sure its lawyers are working out how to get around Impulse Technology's claims. µ

Share this:

Comments
A technicality ?

I've got one : there is no product on the market from any company named Impulse Technology that does anything near to what is stated on the patent.
Therefor, Impulse Tech is nothing but a patent troll. Proof of that is the fact that they waited to see that the product was successful before attacking it.
Personally, I would take all Impluse management and anyone associated with this action (including the lawyers) and have them publicly flogged before throwing the case out.
The fact that they target Microsoft is ironic indeed, but not enough for me to tolerate this unworthy action.

posted by : Pascal Monett, 26 July 2011 Complain about this comment
Vague

Yet another vague catch-all patent of an idea, that should never have been granted.

Reading through the patents it it's the equivalent of someone down the pub waving their arms about saying you know what I'd have this "thing" and it would like see where you are and you could move about and it would like let you compete against someone else and it would be on your computer. and. and.

oh yeah, I'll have another thanks.

no detail, lots of vague statements trying to make it as broad as possible covering as many possible situations. A bit about "you could have this device connected to a printer and it could output your performance data"

FFS.

posted by : Ivor, 25 July 2011 Complain about this comment
I dont see a way around so they will make a deal

If there is a way around a patent why wouldn't any company do so over paying royalties? Microsoft in most cases will license or buy out the company for its patent portfolio but that's not news only litigation makes news. If the company is a patent troll and not willing to negotiate then its worth Microsoft fighting this in court long term after all they do have attorneys on payroll and litigation wont hurt the end payout.

posted by : Mitchell, 25 July 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?