The Inquirer-Home

IPTV is a minefield for everyone

Not just consumers
Thu Jul 21 2011, 12:00

TODAY'S PANEL at the Westminster Eforum unanimously agreed that Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) has barriers for consumers, broadcasters, manufacturers and retailers.

TVs that connect to the internet, also generally called Smart TVs, have seen little uptake over the past few years. This is apparently set to grow but there are a number of issues surrounding the technology.

Matthew Hester, research director at Ipsos MediaCT believes that sales of Smart TV technology will significantly grow even after showing statistics that illustrate half of consumers are not interested in purchasing an IPTV.

The biggest barrier, according to the research, is the cost of buying the device, with 34 per cent giving that answer. What will eventually happen is that consumers will probably buy a new TV without fully knowing that it has the capability to connect to the internet.

Dr Paul Entwistle, CTO at Pace said, "With the amount of devices connected together getting exponentially bigger and more complicated for consumers. There is a need for one single platform from service providers."

A common theme from all the experts on the panel, which included employees from Samsung and the BBC, was a need for social networking and a seamless experience across multiple devices and screens.

There is confusion over whose job it is to explain the technology, what with it being somewhat new and confusing for consumers. Retailers are often unable to display a device like an IPTV actually connected to the internet and working properly.

Simon Gauntlett, technology director at Digital TV Group thinks that there is a need for a uniform brand or logo to inform and satisfy consumers across the market that the product is IPTV, such as the logo for Freeview or the Digital Tick.

Keen to advertise the brand, Dan Saunders, head of Content Services at Samsung said, "Consumers have never had it so good". An interesting hint was made by Phil Fearnley, GM of News and Knowledge at the BBC towards a future service where additional information will be made available through a secondary device.

For example, extra information about a football match, including team and match statistics could be sent to view on a tablet or smartphone during a game. This prevents taking up real estate on the TV screen and interrupting other viewers' experience. µ

Share this:

Comments
Stupid retailers are stupid.

"Retailers are often unable to display a device like an IPTV actually connected to the internet and working properly."

This has been a pet peeve of mine for a long time. I hate going to a store to try out a device, and find out all they have is a plastic case with an insert that acts as a pretend screen. Thanks for wasting my time Walmart and Best Buy.

posted by : Jason Goatcher, 23 July 2011 Complain about this comment
What's in a name - but the sweet smell of money

Perhaps they should first get a handle of what IPTV is, and a TV with a browser that gets youtubes is NOT IPTV.
IPTV is 'regular' TV that is delivered using TCP/IP (multicast) and smart TV's are just TV's with an embedded simple computer that does web stuff and maybe plays some media from USB sticks.

And although there is some overlap I think it's important to keep the 2 separated when talking rules, since the experiences in the US shows that if you don't that the ISP's and media moguls will abuse that confusion by for instance not allowing browsers embedded in TV's to view stupid web videos like youtubes, just as a way to shake more money out of consumers by making TV manufacturers pay, or by forcing subscriptions for your TV (disgusting insanity).

posted by : W.-, 21 July 2011 Complain about this comment
Wrong name

Should read 'Simon' Gauntlett,

posted by : Colin Mann, 21 July 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?