MOBILE CHIP DESIGNER Qualcomm has told The INQUIRER that LTE isn't necessarily the answer to the UK's mobile data woes in the immediate future. And what's more, it also warned that the quality of mobile phone calls could suffer when the system is introduced.
The issue, as Qualcomm sees it, is that LTE isn't quite ready for prime time yet, and that HSPA+ is a better bet for the next year or so. It also told us that it would like to see more phones and service providers pushing HSPA+ as soon as possible, which it claims will pay dividends in terms of efficiency and speed.
The biggest problem with LTE is how to handle voice traffic. Currently, with GSM and UTMS there's a complex system for handling voice calls. LTE should simplify that, but in order to do so it needs all voice calls to be delivered as packet data. This is unlike the current system, which uses circuit switching for voice traffic and handles data separately.
Qualcomm told us that the current plan in the UK is to use Voice Over LTE (VOLTE). That will, however, require a complete change in how mobile networks operate. Until now, voice calls have always been circuit switched, while data is, obviously, packet switched. The transition to a completely packet switched network will be expensive and take time.
So, in the meantime we'll be using a system that's like the one used by Verizon in the US, but slightly different. The main thing UK users will notice is that with early LTE implementations it won't be possible to have a data and voice connection simultaneously. To take a call, the phone will switch from the data radio over to the voice radio. On Verizon, handsets allow both data and voice at the same time, but can only achieve this with two radios working at the same time.
It's fair to say that using two radios all the time has a significant impact on battery life, and while it's undesirable to lose data connectivity while you talk, it should mean that LTE phones in the UK will have a little more stamina. But it's still a significantly worse situation than the one we have with 3G at the moment.
On the face of it, speed is an issue here. LTE promises greatly increased download and upload rates over UTMS 3G. But there is more to the mobile data experience than just speed. The time it takes for your phone to open a data connection is one area that LTE improves over HSPA, but HSPA+ addresses some of these problems too, and it's far easier to roll out than an entirely new 4G network. Indeed, in the UK Three has switched its network over and O2 is in the middle of doing so too.
Perhaps Qualcomm is right. It probably is more sensible for us to hold off LTE until mobile providers are ready to roll out voice over LTE rather than take a step backwards and use phones that can do either voice or data, but not both at any one time. µ
Tags: Hardware
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1725665/the-upcoming-smartphones
Thing is the chips should be GSM-4G dual-mode... upon that the thing is whether during EDGE or 4G use...will i still get my GSM number not-responding!?! i.e. during my GSM-trafic my 4G side should also remain connected.
On camera front they are still deceiving people by just bumping MP count. Cunningly no one talks to introduce taking snaps/stills during video capture. Rest aside defusing solar panel into touchscreen for making them self reliant on power no matter how minimal.
It's strange that you don't even mention Qualcomm potential interests at stake in such a communication.
Do they deliver HSDPA+ chips, but do not deliver LTE one before one or two years ? (when it is going to be "the right time" for LTE) ? What's their market share in each of these ones ?
These context elements are vital to understand corporate communication.
It seems to work AFAICS, if I don't watch movies all day or fileshare. The basic problem is that most consumer phone deals seem to be non-tethering, i.e. you contractually can't use the phone to serve data to a different device. I assume that isn't a technical problem, despite the article. So I use a wi-fi data dongle from Huawei, serves 5, with a 3G contract from Three, 15 GB a month, plus a 2G phone SIM in my Samsung Galaxy Tab, which can use the Huawei thingy for Internet. I probably could also use Skype.
So where's the woe? (Sullom Voe? I don't know. I don't intend to go.)
"At last an end to 'vaguely wondering whether LTE would be better than the 3G we've currently got' misery"?