The Inquirer-Home

Intel will push Atom beyond Moore's Law to catch up with ARM

Hopes for a wider role for its pint sized chip
Wed May 18 2011, 12:17

CHIPMAKER Intel will aggressively push its Atom processor over the next three years as it tries to narrow the gap between its x86 chip business and established ARM based system-on-chip (SoC) processors.

During Intel's investor event, CEO Paul Otellini outlined how Intel will accelerate the Atom's process node to 14nm by 2013. According to Otellini, Intel will push the Atom at double the rate of Moore's Law in order to increase the Atom's chances against SoCs using rival architectures.

Earlier this month Chipzilla announced it will adopt the use of tri-gate transistors to fab chips at the 22nm process node and the firm mentioned then that the Atom will be on an "accelerated tick-tock schedule". Otellini revealed that the 22nm Atom chip will be codenamed Silvermont with the 14nm variant codenamed Airmont.

Surprisingly, Otellini also said that Intel wants to increase the range of power consumption from SoCs, from the sub-1W region to almost 10W. Otellini's presentation said that this will give Intel a "full spectrum of products from milliwatts to megawatts".

While most SoC chip houses talk about the power efficiency of their designs, Intel seems to believe that the performance of its SoCs will mean that there will be applications where a 10W SoC can do the job of a traditional CPU. This is also one of the reasons why Intel has started to aggressively push its Atom chip in the server market where it believes the relatively low power Atom chip can serve the needs of firms such as Facebook.

Intel's Andy Bryant, EVP and chief administrative officer at Intel, who started his presentation with a dig at AMD founder Jerry Sanders by titling his presentation, "Real men have fabs, real business people have profits", said that eight quarters was about the "optimal cycle" to stick to a particular process node. Intel currently operates on a two-year 'tick-tock' cycle, under which it expects to ship 14nm chips by 2013.

Intel was also bullish on its smartphone performance, saying that it makes more money than any other silicon vendor in the smartphone market. Intel is technically correct as, although ARM-based chips are found in the vast majority of smartphones and tablets, the British firm doesn't actually make the silicon, instead it licenses designs to numerous chip designers, some of them fabless.

It's not surprising that Intel is pushing its Atom so hard because unlike its line of desktop, laptop and workstation chips, it simply needs make inroads into a rapidly growing smartphone market. Widening the possible uses for Atom chips will help, but what it really needs to do is work on getting an x86 Atom chip into milliwatt territory if it is really going to end up in the mobile devices bought by consumers. µ

Share this:

Comments
And what about the Intel law of sabotage?

We all know that Intel purposely crippled demand for Atom gadgets by imposing severe OEM restrictions.

I'd certainly bet an ultrabook on them having them staying PC crippled.
No ultra netbooks for you Atom!

posted by : Alan Denman, 09 December 2011 Complain about this comment
Atom crippled to 2gb

Atom is crippled to 2gb memory by intel. How can it get any better ? ONly some intel ulv cpus see all the memory. Better buy AMD or VIA 64 cpus which see all the memory. 8gb single sdimm is selling now but intel wants to limit us to 2gb.

posted by : Sam, 08 June 2011 Complain about this comment
Duh

Everyone seems to be missing Intel's point - Atom is x86 compatible, which means that you can put all of your desktop applications on it and run them.

Oh, really - you don't want or need to do that? Hmm - that could be a problem. What's the matter with you? Don't you want the most powerful CPU in your mobile phone? Don't you want to be compatible with Micr0$uck$ LoseDoze Operating System (O/S)?

posted by : Hucklebuck, 19 May 2011 Complain about this comment
Maybe 3-5 Yrs Behind

Intel is trying to shoehorn a watt design into a miliwatt playground... over the next couple of years, pushing Atom closer to the atomic scale might help but they will need to cut out some of the fat.

As batteries are not moving at the same rate of improvement, we really need companies not pushing power hungry SoC into the mobile space. I is common to expect your device to work at least within a "human operational time of 24 hrs" with low time to charge. Lets not let the line slip back but forward please...

Mean while Nvidia, is working to bring a range of ARM out and they are indeed moving the TDP up as they are considering desktop or at leat notebook level ARM SoC designs in the near future. MS building Windows 8 for ARM seems to be in line with where the market is opening up.

I fear more for the developer if the tools are not available to support the cross platforms.

posted by : MrAnderson, 18 May 2011 Complain about this comment
Nvidia roadmap

They may be outdated, but Nvidia roadmaps have shown that in 2012 they may be rolling out Tegra Wayne (Tegra 4?) with A15 cores. A15 will be 40% faster per clock than A9, and top out at 2.5 ghz. A9 usually runs at 1 ghz, so we'll be looking at up to 3.5X performance.

Atom is already behind, and with ARM not standing still Intel needs to get their butt in gear.

Intel switching Atom to the server side to justify higher TDP, meh. If Intel has any need to justify higher TDP in Atom, Intel might as well throw inthe towel for MIDs.

posted by : mike, 18 May 2011 Complain about this comment
????

And by this time ARM wil have Cortex A15 out, which will be at least 40% faster than cortex A9. And lets face it the A9 power/performance ration is by far greater than any atom. In my opionion i don't think they have a chance they are at least a decade behind!

posted by : parkerm35, 18 May 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?