The Inquirer-Home

Apple asks for antitrust lawsuit to be dropped

Claims it blocked third-party downloads to improve quality
Tue Apr 19 2011, 10:12

MAKER OF SHINY TOYS Apple has asked a court to dismiss an antitrust lawsuit brought against it by consumers.

The controversy began when Apple blocked files made by music firm Realnetworks from working on the Ipod, only days after Realnetworks launched its service. An Itunes customer, Thomas Slattery, led the charge in a class-action lawsuit against the company, claiming it was operating a monopoly and acting in an uncompetitive manner.

One of Apple's attorneys, Robert Mittelstaedt, said that the company only blocked the files to improve downloading quality for Itunes customers, a claim that is unlikely to wash with the court.

"Apple's view is that iPods work better when consumers use the iTunes jukebox rather than third party software that can cause corruption or other problems," Mittelstaedt said, according to Bloomberg.

While it's obvious that Apple products work better with Apple products, that doesn't mean users should be stripped of their ability to choose third-party products. Realnetworks' service did not have compatitibility issues or become faulty. It was deliberately blocked by Apple, which certainly raises big question marks in terms of competitive practices.

Mittelstaedt said that Apple had received 58 complaints from consumers relating to downloads and that this was the reason it updated its software to block third-party downloads. The judge asked if Apple had carried out tests to confirm that downloads from other companies were the reason behind the complaints, but Mittelstaedt said Apple had not done so.

Apple's CEO, Steve Jobs, faced two hours of questioning earlier this month over the consumer antitrust lawsuit.

Apple's request for dismissal will be decided by May. µ

Share this:

Comments
This old chestnut

Apple have no problems with people loading iPods with music from whatever source they like (CDs, Amazon etc), but Real hacked Apples DRM format and tried to sell DRMed music using it. They were perfectly free to sell non-DRMed music for it, or DRMed music for MS devices but they acted all surprised and hurt when apple fixed the security hole they had found.

posted by : Steve T, 19 April 2011 Complain about this comment
<whatever

That should have read : "whatever MS product is being pushed to day".

Interestingly, putting that text between upper and lower brackets made the text unreadable.

posted by : Pascal Monett, 19 April 2011 Complain about this comment
"Apple's view is that iPods work better when consumers use the iTunes jukebox"

Well duh.

Microsoft's view is that any PC works better with <whatever .

Really, is that even an argument ? Who in their right mind is going to put out a product then say that it "works better" with a competitor's product ?

Stupid, redundant argument.

posted by : Pascal Monett, 19 April 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?