The Inquirer-Home

RIM shows off its Blackberry Playbook tablet

Appears to be missing some important plays
Fri Apr 15 2011, 13:00

SMARTPHONE MAKER Research in Motion (RIM) has shown off its tablet device called the Blackberry Playbook in the US with a cocktail splashed party but apparently an inferior product.

Some might have expected the firm to throw a party, but although there were cocktails at the event it was light on big speeches, which was probably wise because the last time RIM took to the public arena it sulked off halfway through.

Earlier this week during an interview with the BBC, CEO Mike Lazrides took offence to a line of questioning about the firm's disputes with various governments, a topic that must have been on a 'do not mention' list that somehow did not find its way to his BBC host.

"That's not fair. You implied we had a security problem," said Lazaridis before walking out. "We've just been singled out because we're so successful around the world. It's an iconic product."

Whether a big fanfare would have improved the device's reception is moot, as early looks suggest that it comes up lacking when compared against other 7-inch tablets and is more of a trial run for the Canadian firm than a finished product.

"I've just come from RIM's launch event for the BlackBerry PlayBook tablet. The tablet has evolved since CES, but my impressions of it remain the same. In short, it's a racecar that's missing a wheel," said Forrester's Sarah Rottman Epps on her blog.

Most bizarrely, and most open to criticism is the mysterious lack of an email client, which surely would have been on any list of features expected on a Blackberry device. Although Blackberry handsets can communicate with the Playbook using Bluetooth, other users will have to make do with webmail.

"The PlayBook is a powerful device with solid hardware, lighter and more compact than the iPad. But by requiring a Bluetooth connection to a BlackBerry phone for basic applications like email, calendar, and IM, RIM has sacrificed consumer-friendliness for CIO peace-of-mind," added Rottman Epps.

So, it looks like the Blackberry Playbook tablet has missed the Ipad trick of being sort of business friendly and having definite consumer appeal, for now at least.

RIM will release the Blackberry Playbook on 19 May. µ

Share this:

Comments
@ James

The blackberry playbook can run Android applications natively.

posted by : grndzro, 21 April 2011 Complain about this comment
And so????

lack of email client is no big deal. you can DL the Opera or Firefox browser and easily tie any pop3 or SMTP client, Directly to Opera or to FF via an addon.

On top of that Android apps work on the playbook NATIVELY, just DL an android email client.

posted by : grndzro, 18 April 2011 Complain about this comment
RIM: Focus on what you do well!

RIM pretty much owns the corporate market because the devices are secure and can be managed by policy pushed through the BES. The Playbook is an exciting option for the corporate users because it allows secure access to the corporate intranet through the Blackberry with a reasonable size screen. Nobody in the corporate world cares about commercial apps - they are generally blocked by policy anyway. As long as RIM focuses on giving their corporate customers what they want, they will do well - even if they never sell another device to a consumer.

posted by : Jim, 15 April 2011 Complain about this comment
nothing to do with replacing phones..

@ Robert Carnegie; The issue isn't that you need a phone as well as the playbook, it's that you must have a blackberry phone linked tot he device in order to use a "native" email client.

If you don't have a blackberry you're limited to webmail, not even a gmail app.. just a link to the web logon.

They're trying to aim this at a business market, but limiting functionality if you don't already use blackberry.

posted by : james, 15 April 2011 Complain about this comment
So it's to have as well as a phone, not instead of.

I bought Samsung Galaxy Tab which is both, but in kind of a weird way. Not the phone for everyone. I suppose more people will prefer to have two devices. So maybe it isn't such a big mistake by RIM.

posted by : Robert Carnegie, 15 April 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?