
The only problem [Nvidia has] is that at some point your eyes don't get any better - Bob Colwell, former chief architect, Intel
RUPERT MURDOCH'S UK tabloid rag News of the World (NOTW) could have hacked up to 7,000 phones, according to lawyers.
NOTW's lead balloon apology for phone hacking celebrities and other rag worthy high-profile people looks set to realise diminishing returns. The tabloid is already embroiled in fresh scandal as a top lawyer said the newspaper's hacks hacked up to 7,000 phones.
Mishcon de Reya lawyer Charlotte Harris, who also wangled millions in damages for Max Clifford from NOTW after he was hacked, told the Independent that we aren't near the truth yet. Harris said that if someone hacks one phone, they then get access to everyone's personal details who leaves a message for them. She suggested that the numbers of phones involved will likely increase by several thousand, which puts the figure anywhere between 4,000 and 7,000.
With all the gusto of a NOTW gutter hack, another lawyer, Rod Dadak of Lewis Silkin said the scandal was "Rupert Murdoch's Watergate" and the potential litigation figure is between £20 and £40 million. NOTW might have to add a bit of cash to the top up fund it put together for aggrieved parties.
The NOTW hasn't actually explained to anyone who it hacked. All it offered was that it is conducting an "extensive internal investigation" and has contacted "some civil litigants with an unreserved apology and an admission of liability".
The only named victims so far include Sienna Miller, designer Kelly Hoppen, former minister Tessa Jowell, and sports agent Sky Andrews. If Charlotte Harris has her maths right, the number of potential plaintiffs that Murdoch might have to pay off could shoot up remarkably. µ
Tags: Software
Boris Johnson wrote an interesting column about this in the Telegraph today:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/borisjohnson/8442070/One-thing-is-bugging-me-about-this-News-of-the-World-phone-hacking-scandal.html
His line is that it's not so bad, because
a) certainly more than one newspaper did it, and
b) the victims are all a bunch of greedy celebs.
Now why would he stick his head above the parapeet to defend the NOTW?
a) A high-profile politician with further ambitions needs brownie points with Rupert Murdoch.
b) Somebody should have a closer look at the Spectator.
c) All of the above.
It's definitely wrong to hack and the hackers should be punished. The siren chasers however are in it for the money not for justice.