INTERNET GIANT Google has revealed efforts it is making to secure the Internet's public key infrastructure, after one of its Secure Socket Layers (SSL) certificates was issued fraudulently last month.
Along with Yahoo, Skype, Mozilla, and Microsoft, the search giant was embarrassed after web security firm Comodo found that one of its affiliated registration authorities had been compromised.
This allowed fake SSL certificates to be issued purporting to belong to the big firms involved, although they were quickly revoked before harm was done. SSL is a cryptographic protocol that is supposed to provide protection for Internet communications.
In a blog post, Google said it is working on a "Google Certificate Catalogue", which will be a database of all the SSL certificates its web crawlers see.
Ben Laurie of the Google security team said, "The basic idea is that if a certificate doesn't appear in our database, despite being correctly signed by a well-known CA and having a matching domain name, then there may be something suspicious about that certificate."
But it is difficult to manually access the data in the Google Certificate Catalogue, so the company is working on ways to add support for it to the Chrome web browser. Google said it will also use DNSSEC, a way to publish DNS records that are cryptographically protected, for the Certificate Catalogue.
Once DNSSEC is more broadly deployed, then Google can push for domain operators to publish information about the SSL certificates on their hosts, a project called DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE).
Laurie said, "It should be possible, using DANE DNS records, to specify particular certificates which are valid, or [which] Certificate Authority (CA) [is] allowed to sign certificates for those hosts."
"So, once more, if a certificate is seen that isn't consistent with the DANE records, it should be treated with suspicion." µ
Is this a banana I see before me, etc
Bad news for developers, good news for SoundCloud
Windows 10 Pro users kicked in the craw again
It might feature a 3.5mm headphone jack, after all