The Inquirer-Home

UK is at 24th place in broadband table, Hong Kong is top

Point Topic top ten has no room for the UK
Tue Nov 30 2010, 15:10

SOUTH KOREA not being number one for consumer broadband may be a shock to some but sadly the UK hovering at 24th place is probably not.

Point Topic, a broadband analysis firm, has released its latest rankings for consumer broadband value for money and placed the UK down at a lowly 24th position. Hong Kong meanwhile sits at the top of the list.

The firm analyses various broadband metrics, and this month it released its quarterly broadband economics figures. The rankings are based on the cost for a one year connection and the charges for one megabit of bandwidth.

Perhaps surprisingly, given the noise the government makes about its high speed pretensions, the UK sits well outside the top ten. Well outside the top ten, and even outside the top twenty. To be in that top ten having fibre to your home is critical.

"Nine of the ten best value tariffs are either pure fibre or hybrid offerings where fibre is a significant part of the local loop. The exception is Germany where Unity Media offer a cable service that is very competitive," said Fiona Vanier, senior analyst at Point Topic.

"Bandwidth will continue to increase as fibre edges closer to the consumer. Higher speeds generally mean better value for the consumer. All that remains is to work out how best to use it."

Hong Kong had the connection that was the best value for money, and here a Fibre Home 1000 connection from HKBN would set you back $0.028 per Mb. This tariff easily beat Japan in second place where the same would cost you $0.048, and Romania in third with its $0.163 charges.

The UK, in 24th place, has a cost of $0.912, and the US at 30th charges $1.315.

The most expensive charges can be found in Peru, where users should expect to part with $209.29 per Mb. It's no wonder Paddington moved. µ

 

Share this:

Comments
And if your vwith Virgin

With no apparent download limit? just a slowing down during peak periods,it would be differcult to get a true figure.

posted by : morrig, 01 December 2010 Complain about this comment
Is that supposedly a joke or what?

Does it mentioned that the "Fiber Home xxx" services have the oversea connection all capped at 20Mbps?

Does it also mentioned that the lag time for oversea connection are all sky high?

Does it also mentioned that that xxx mb is just an advertising figures? And in actual environment, they settled for 80% of the advertised speed. So you cannot even complain while it show 80% of the speed on your connections to your Fiber Home 1000 buddies.

posted by : _pls_ask_some_local_, 01 December 2010 Complain about this comment
Quota's?

Have they taken data quota's into account?

Country A may be paying .2/mbit, whereas B may be paying .25/mbit, however A may have a quota of 60GB/month, whereas B might have 100GB/month or even have no quota at all, so which is better value?

posted by : eldakka, 01 December 2010 Complain about this comment
Mb or Mbps

You had me confused there for a bit, or perhaps ...for a second.

Megabits *per second*, right?

Yeah, I know. But why not write it out correctly?

posted by : JeffyPooh, 30 November 2010 Complain about this comment
Simple to fix

All that needs doing is plugging a mahousively fast internet link into, for example, my house. If that link is fast enough then the average across the whole of the UK would have been brought up to world beating levels without the fuss and bother of having to upgrade all ISP links. Simples!

posted by : Bazza, 30 November 2010 Complain about this comment
Wondering

Is that actual Mbit or advertised Mbit?

posted by : W.-, 30 November 2010 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?