
A girl I know wrote gullible on the ceiling of her school. She kept telling people that the word was written on the ceiling - Charlie Demerjian
QUESTIONS have been raised as to whether Novell's sale of assets to a Microsoft backed consortium has led to the Vole acquiring a number of Unix patents.
Novell's $2.2 billion sale to Attachmate Corporation included a $450 million sale of "certain intellectual property assets" to CPTN Holdings LLC, a consortium that is led by Microsoft. The question is, which of Novell's assets will CPTN Holdings acquire?
In fighting off the almost laughable legal challenge by SCO over Unix 'ownership', it was determined Novell, not SCO, owns AT&T's former Unix patents. Aside from owning the core Unix patents, Novell also runs Suse, a Linux distribution that goes head to end with Red Hat in the enterprise market.
At this point it is not known why Microsoft is interested in Novell's patents, after all the two firms have a chequered history when it comes to intellectual property battles. There's still ongoing litigation between the companies over anti-competitive behaviour on Microsoft's part in the office suite business, an industry that Novell used to compete in with its Wordperfect word processor.
It is also coming to the end of a five-year ceasefire agreed to by the two firms that stopped Microsoft from asserting any rights over Novell's Suse Linux distribution. That deal still has a year left to run but given that the sale of assets won't be completed until sometime in the first quarter of 2011, it does seem possible that Microsoft is getting its ducks in a row.
If Microsoft's acquisition of Novell's IP assets is indeed the start of what some might see as the Vole's second sustained attack on Linux through the courts, then it will find that a lot has changed since its sock puppet SCO tried its hand seven years ago. Back in 2003, when news of SCO's baseless claims of Unix ownership became public, the Linux operating system had far fewer supporters in business than it does now.
The last seven years have seen Linux not only grow up with firms such as Google publicly backing Linux alongside traditional cheerleaders such as Red Hat and IBM, but overall use of Linux has skyrocketed. Linux has also seen significant growth in enterprise deployment, including in the weighty financial sector. Any aggressive action by Microsoft is likely to result in far greater backlash than SCO faced in 2003 and might end up with the Vole facing another challenge that is simply can do without.
Of course all this is assuming that Microsoft has shelled out all that money to acquire Novell's Unix patents and that those patents are even relevant to Linux, given the licensing protection that the GPL extends to patents. It can also be seen as Microsoft hedging its bets against its Windows operating system dying on its feet and the firm having to start again from scratch.
In related news, the new owner of Novell, Attachmate, has said that it plans to operate Suse as a stand-alone business unit of which Opensuse, a free consumer oriented Linux distribution, is an "important part". In a statement, Jeff Hawn, the chairman and CEO of Attachmate said, "If this transaction closes, then after closing, Attachmate Corporation anticipates no change to the relationship between the SUSE business and the openSUSE project as a result of this transaction."
Not for the first time, Microsoft's stealthy dealings with software patents have cast a cloud of suspicion over the Vole's intentions. µ
Tags: Microsoft
The BIGGER picture.....
WHY, oh WHY would the evil empire BUY ANYTHING!!
They backed SCO against Novell / IBM.
MS WANTS NO COMPETITION... Failing that they want to STIFLE / CRIPPLE Competition.
MS plays to WIN. The QUICK game when they can. The LONG game when needed.
Them buying these assets, as well as AttachMate says they play a better game than even us old hands are used to MS playing. REMEMBER They sat across from more than Government around the world and apologized in currency ( fines ) for this sort of crap. Anyone thinking this is Biz as usual bettr re-read MS history as well as current sites like www.theregister.com
Oh and the trades reporting over here in the EU about MS history of stiffeling competition.
Micr0$uck$ should have been GIVEN the rights to that IP in the first place, as they invented and innovated both computers and the internet. That they had to pay anything is a crime.
Could someone else come rich enough to buy Novell? So it won't have to sell it to M$...?
Anyone? IBM? no?
Anyway, I can see 2 points why M$ wanted to buy up Novell.
1) To get better understanding on the Unix core. So M$ can tailor made its attack (buy replacing the Unix function with M$ alternatives).
2) To tighten up control on this patents, so no one else could have it (or license it). And eventually, kill off Unix.
Well, we are waiting our White Knight to come and save the patents.
Isn't this more about Microsoft protecting (buying back) their own recent joint IP venture with Novell?
As to networking, sure (you must be nuts) let's put a proprietary network client stack back on the device! and return us all back to the era of IPX SAPs because this TCP/IP crap is really, really awful!
...but some companies use patents to prevent any kind of change happening.
I'm sure Microsoft is after Novell's patents for networking. They were the first and sustained that lead for many years. In the past, if you weren't a Novell administrator you were not a network administrator. Novell created a lot of technology that it licensed to various companies including Microsoft.
This sort of gives Microsoft another monopoly in networking--and if it wasn't for Linux it'd have it all.
450 million to MS isn't that much. And it could give you a whole range of legal options should you ever need them.
Sounds ok to me.
All these folks whinging about the patents. Business is business folks. Go Microsoft.