THE FICKLE FINGER OF BLAME has been pointed squarely at Google, Verizon and Comcast by US Federal Communication Commission (FCC) chairman Julius Genachowski when it comes to hindering net neutrality.
Speaking at the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco, Genachowski pressed the need for a net neutrality policy in order to help it oversee Internet service providers (ISPs) traffic management plans. He also blamed deals between Google and Verizon for dragging down the possibilities of net neutrality.
Particularly damaging was the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruling throwing out the FCC's decision to regulate Comcast's traffic management policy. Genachowski said that this had "derailed" the FCC's plans, adding, "We were on course to adopt smart, sensible rules when we got a frustrating and seriously incorrect decision from the courts that complicated what we had to do."
Talking of the Google Verizon August pact, Genachowski said he thought that it had "an effect of slowing down some other policies that could have led to a resolution". Google's decision to side with one of the Internet's few Tier 1 transit providers was one of the first publicly acknowledged pacts between content and network providers.
It has been said that such deals could stifle competition, as smaller outfits are unable to pay the premiums that large companies such as Google are able to do so. This would in turn place them at a significant disadvantage and cripple their ability to compete with large firms.
The FCC has been lobbying for greater rights in order to enforce its net neutrality principles, however it has come up against resistance not only from network providers but courts ruling against it, as was the case with Comcast.
The FCC must hope that the tide turns before other firms announce similar deals to push their traffic at higher priority than others, potentially turning the Internet into a clone of cable TV. µ
Tags: Google
Here's an idea, since the court says the FCC can't regulate the internet how about the nice folks of the TSA take over? They have the same trackrecord as the FCC as being so levelheaded and all for freedom.
Because sure looks like a gov't intelligence service, and at the least does sell your info to gov't, besides any entity which pays. So I don't expect the FCC to prevail, but amazingly, even after several months, still looks as though the FCC is on the right side.
I didn't read this at all; I just clicked on this page because of the inappropriate title...
Sigh..we have allowed, hell, subsidized these telco and cable monopolies for decades, with little benefit to the average citizen but an ill-behaved, greedy providers. I'm no communist, but it's time for us to take back the infrastructure and rent it back to them. With competitors able to rent at the same price, of course.