CONVICTED SOFTWARE MONOPOLIST Microsoft has somehow managed to garner the support of just about everyone that matters in the world of technology to support its bid to change patent law.
The move came after the Vole lost a lawsuit to i4i for $290 million last year. The lawsuit by i4i had threatened to stop the firm from selling its word processing application, Microsoft Word, and its productivity suite, Microsoft Office. Microsoft then went on the campaign trail for patents to be more 'defendant friendly', in the hopes that would ward off patent lawsuits.
Now the Redmond firm has managed to get briefs filed by the likes of Apple, Google, Dell, HP, Toyota and even Wal-Mart to support its effort. Perhaps surprisingly, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the Apache Foundation have also publicly supported Microsoft's efforts.
Microsoft and its band of supporters essentially want to make it easier to invalidate patents by lowering the quality of evidence required at court. The EFF claims that the current patent regime "undermines the traditional patent bargain between private patent owners and the public and threatens to impede innovation and the dissemination of knowledge." Patents were envisaged as a tool to allow just that, the sharing of proprietary information without fear of the inventor losing financial rights for a certain period of time.
In truth, Microsoft's request for a reform of the patent system is something that is far from a charitable act. Not only does the move come after losing a lawsuit, albeit with a fine that is little more than pocket change for the firm, it and the other firms stand to gain financial security should the burden of proof be moved towards the accusing party.
So while Microsoft has managed to conjure up a rare thing, uniting some of technology's biggest firms and rivals, this looks like it's not in the name of charity but rather a circling of the wagons against patent trolls. µ
Tags: DellGoogleAppleMicrosoft
Too bad I cant come up with something to make $290 million dollars. I think if you take something that not yours you should be punished, and Microsoft was can I say $290 million.
Microsoft gets a taste of its own medicine, then goes all huffy over patent attacks. that's called not being able to take what you dish out.
I'll bet all the little companies Microsoft stomped on would have liked to hear that declaration.
Pot, meet the (black) Kettle. Micr0$uck$ can't make a mobile phone O/S that anyone wants, so what do they do? Sue Motorola over Android - over patents. No big surprise here.
as long as the new version of the law is reinforced equally. There's a saying that applies perfectly to this, in my opinion.
Be careful what you wish for because you just might get it.
If new guidelines are passed that reduce the quality necessary for the defendant to supply, that should apply to all defendants. So Microsoft's big bad lawsuit club gets shrunk a bit, hopefully.
Sounds like a damn fine idea to me. Kick Microsoft in the ass while looking them in the eye.
Let's get this done YESTERDAY.
"patent trolls"
Call it what you will...patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to pay”.
For the truth about trolls, please see http://truereform.piausa.org.
What about Microsoft’s own patent saber-rattling against Linux, for example? Will we see an end to that?