The Inquirer-Home

3D smartphone to launch this year says Sharp

It's the parallax view
Fri Sep 03 2010, 08:51

A STEREOSCOPIC 3D SMARTPHONE will be launched this year, and by stereoscopic its manufacturer Sharp means it will not need passive or active shutter glasses for depth perception.

At IFA 2010 Sharp has been demonstating its stereoscopic 3D screen technology for smartphones and tablets, which was unveiled in April but it is now talking products. A 3.8-inch and a 10.6-inch stereoscopic 3D screen was on display. Sharp LCD marketing development senior director Q Nishishiba told The INQUIRER, "There will be a smartphone product later this year. It will have a 4.3-inch screen but I can't say who the customer is. The 10.6-inch screen will come in tablet products later."

The displays use what Sharp calls its parallax barrier technolog. A parallax barrier is placed in front of the normal LCD and consists of a layer of material with a series of precision slits, allowing each eye to see a different set of pixels creating the sense of depth. To get this effect however the screen has to be at a specific distance and for the 10.6-inch and 3.8-inch displays its 50cm and 30cm respectively. µ

Share this:

Comments
Paralax blocking?

You mean like those striped plasticky things that were used to make some baseball/pokemon/whatever cards in cereal boxes look 3D? Damn Sharp, you're innovating a lot...

posted by : Monsieur, 03 September 2010 Complain about this comment
"I can't say who the customer is"

Nor can anyone else.

3D TV I can just about understand, if you can accept sitting in your house wearing stupid glasses. But a 3D phone? Who asked for this?

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

posted by : bananaphone, 03 September 2010 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?