
The longest place name is Taumatawhakatangihangakoauauotamateaturi-pukakapikimaungahoronukupokaiwhenuakitanatahu - it's in New Zealand
LEADER OF FASHION HOUSE Apple, Steve Jobs could be in hot water after claims he made in his corporate deniability speech roped other smartphone makers into Apple's faulty antenna mess.
During the 90 minute farce, Jobs tried to explain away the fundamental design flaws of the Iphone 4 antenna by claiming that handsets from Nokia, Blackberry, HTC and Samsung all experienced the same problem. Of course Jobs couldn't substantiate any of his wild claims and might have thought that Apple would be considered innocent by association.
Not surprisingly Nokia and Blackberry were quick to distance themselves from Apple, a company that has designed a smartphone that cannot consistently make phone calls. Nokia took a decidedly direct tone in putting Jobs down, saying, "As you would expect from a company focused on connecting people, we prioritize antenna performance over physical design if they are ever in conflict."
Nokia does admit that antenna performance "may be affected" by the way users grip the phone, though it was quick to point out that it, unlike Apple, has over a decade of experience making devices with internal antennas.
Research In Motion (RIM) however decided to shoot from the hip, rightly taking no prisoners. RIM's co-CEOs Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie labelled the Iphone 4's problems as a "self-made debacle" and said that Jobs' attempt to drag RIM into the gutter with Apple was "unacceptable".
Not content with those soundbites, Lazaridis and Balsillie pointed out what anyone except Jobs and his feverish fanbois can clearly see. "Apple's claims about RIM products appear to be deliberate attempts to distort the public's understanding of an antenna design issue and to deflect attention from Apple's difficult situation."
Jobs could be facing the embarrassment of having to retract the balderdash he came out with in trying to avoid announcing a recall of the Iphone 4. The Blackberry boys couldn't have put Jobs' childish actions more succinctly, saying, "Apple clearly made certain design decisions and it should take responsibility for these decisions rather than trying to draw RIM and others into a situation that relates specifically to Apple."
In a bid to appease the carefully selected press who were in attendance, Jobs decided to show off a padded cell which he claimed was used for Iphone 4 testing. Trying to wow the assembled hacks, Jobs proclaimed that the room cost $100 million to build and equip, which looked likely, given the amount of Apple equipment inside. Judging by the picture laden but fact-shy articles that appeared over the weekend, Jobs' ploy might have worked.
Although Jobs offered a band-aid solution to Antennagate in the form of adding a rubber band, Lazaridis and Balsillie quipped, "One thing is for certain, RIM's customers don't need to use a case for their BlackBerry smartphone to maintain proper connectivity."
It remains to be seen if Jobs will bother to substantiate claims verging on libel that other manufacturers' phones suffer from dodgy antennas. In the meantime, Apple fanbois can revel in an undeserved feeling of entitlement at getting a rubber band to attach to their shiny toy.
UPDATE
Following Nokia and RIM, the two other handset manufacturers that Jobs referred to, Samsung and HTC have chimed in denying the claims made by the cult leader. Even Motorola got in on the act, which is surprising given that Jobs hadn't directly mentioned the company's smartphones.
Samsung's Omnia II was mentioned in Jobs' state of the smartphone address as an example of equally poor antenna performance. However the firm has since refuted Jobs' claims, saying "We have not received significant customer feedback on any signal reduction issue for the Omnia II."
Like his colleagues at Nokia and RIM, Hwan Kim, VP of mobile communications at Samsung reiterated that the firm has many years experience building mobile phones with internal antennas without encountering the same problems as the Iphone 4. Kim, referring to the Iphone 4 'death grip', said that Samsung's internal antenna design "optimizes reception quality for any type of hand-grip use."
HTC, which manufactures the Droid Eris among other smartphones, said that it "carefully engineers our phones to ensure that this effect is minimized in real-world use." Although not quite issuing the categorical denial of its competitors, HTC perhaps needn't worry about Jobs' claims, as it is already fighting a lawsuit against the fruit themed toymaker.
Finally, Motorola co-CEO Sanjay Jha said that it was "disingenuous" to claim all smartphones are the same. Jha also said that Motorola's latest Android smartphone, the Droid X, did not suffer from the same problem as Apple's shiny toy. "In our own testing we have found that Droid X performs much better than iPhone 4 when held by consumers."
Jobs' claims have now not only been refuted by users of the devices he mentioned but also denied by the companies themselves. All that's left now is for the public to judge whether Apple's floundering spinmeister will be able to get away with making these wild claims against its smartphone competitors. µ
Tags: Apple
Anyone with a high school knowledge of physics(or even a passing interest) knows if you earth an antenna it will not work effectively.
I cant think of any other such device that has ever has an exposed(uninsulated) antenna.
I've got to wonder why Jobs even bother to hire engineers if he ignores their advice.
Anyone else read that story that other day about how 'the uninformed will continue to believe a misconception when presented with a fact(that opposes their misconception).' Sound like the basis of all apple marketing.
Perhaps the recent use of the word magic in their marketing is not false advertising, just an illustration/admission of the fact that its all slight of hand...
So Apple's messiah has degraded himself and his company to the point of a tu quoque (you too!) argument huh? How expected.
All Jobs' statement is doing is further soiling Apple's reputation as a company that produces something that may be regarded as superior to its competition. Fine work there Jobs; I thought you knew better.
I was actually thinking that the whole rubber-case-giveaway thing was some sort of bad taste joke.
HEY STUPID APPLE CONSUMERS, WAKE UP, YOUR FAVORITE COMPANY IS GIVING A ***$1 PLASTIC THING*** IN COMPENSATION OF THE MOST SHAMEFUL MISTAKE IN THE MOBILE PHONE HISTORY!
And you people STILL defend them. That's how stupid the human race can get, specially its rich slice.
Now, by equivalence, when Toyota cars get another steering problem they will give away free life insurance to all its owners. Hell, why would they call back, nobody's perfect, every product has its share of problems, don't they?
That's what you get for giving that much of your money to Apple, jerks.
Now lets see in which new ways Apple will screw up with iPhony 5.
Martin is correct. My Blackberry didn't drop calls or data when "held the wrong way". My new Palm Pre + doesn't loose signal at all when "held the wrong way". My Palm Centro and Samsung Blackjack didn't lose signal when "held the wrong way". Jobs bait and switch BS and fake "signal drop" presentation aren't convincing anyone but complete idiots. The iPhone 4 Antennae is on the OUTSIDE. It should be OBVIOUS that having the human hand come into contact with it causes the dropped connection. Sure a case or "rubber band" will help because it places material between the hand and the phone, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is an OBVIOUS DESIGN FLAW and that the "reality distortion field" needs to be lifted and Jobs just admit that they screwed up the design in the first place. The case may be enough to placate folks who have reception issues, but what about the screen and sensor? The case going to fix that too??
"Its a physical fact, tocuh a radio emitting device and you will affect its performance doh!"
Umm, D'oh to you too. Have you read the Nokia and RIM statements? Nokia and RIM conceal their antennas specifically so you cant touch them. The Apple defect is due to the antenna being touched, not merely obstructed. And its a single finger touch that causes the problem. A single finger touch does not cause the same problem on other phones. Steve Jobs sidestepped this important fact by only showing a full hand clasp of said phones but this is not the only contact thta causes problems in the Apple phone. In doing so, he mislead the viewers into thinking the problem with the other phones is EXACTLY the same when in fact it is not in the respect of the single finger touch. Sadly the deathgrip phrase has helped obscure this fact and perhaps the death touch phrase would have been more accurate and harder to defend against.
I have a Nokia N82 and every time I find myself in poor reception areas holding the phone in my hand causes it to drop 4-5 bars (on 7 max) down to 0. Phone calls or data connections drop. I never thought of that as an issue: human body is a shield to radio waves, you cannot change that.
iPhone 4 may have a single particularly weak spot, but I really think all this is just FUD against Apple.
What is it about phone manufacturers that makes them go contrary to obvious best PR? You should *always* stay out of confrontations. What the heck did Jobs say that isn't true? Because yes, holding *any* radio transmitter is going to affect it.
I still think Apple's antenna design is entirely defensible, but they may not have explained that well enough, yet, not wanting to explicitly say: It's too *cool-looking* to worry about getting *best* electrical performance.
Its a physical fact, tocuh a radio emitting device and you will affect its performance doh!
I wonder if this could turn nasty - is there enough evidence for a libel case against Apple?