The Inquirer-Home

San Francisco will tell the world about mobile phone radiation

It's the law there now
Thu Jun 17 2010, 11:07

MOBILE PHONE USERS in the UK and EU will soon be able to tell if their mobile gadget is more or less likely to be toasting their brain cells.

A law passed in San Francisco will require mobile phone companies to post how much radiation they are pouring into your ear everytime you ring someone up to say, "I am on the train".

Retailers will have to list each phone's "specific absorption rate", which is the measurement of radiation absorbed by a phone user's body tissue that each manufacturer is required to register with the US Federal Communications Commission.

It only applies to San Francisco but the lists will be up on the web and will most likely be copied worldwide.

San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom said that it is a modest and very reasonable measure that provides greater transparency and information for consumers for whom this is a concern.

The Wireless Association opposed the measure, saying it could mislead consumers into believing that some mobile phones are safer than others. The association claims mobile phones that generate a lot of radiation are just as safe as those that don't.

Mobile phones are not labelled as more or less safe, but consumers are likely to make such inferences themselves by looking at phones' published specific radiation absorption rates. µ

 

Share this:

Comments
Easy to get around

Cell Phone Companies simply need to close up shop in San Francisco proper. Do business all around the city. No corporate presence, no need to comply with local rules.

posted by : Dan, 17 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Looks like they think we are stupid.

Ok. Help me to understand...maybe I am the crazy one here. Isn't any type of radiation dangerous? And if one phone does emit more radiation than another then does it not make that phone more dangerous than another. Why change the language to trick the consumer? Let us choose to be responsible by disclosing information and not masking importance/unimportance by selection of words.

posted by : WHAT?!?, 17 June 2010 Complain about this comment
more toast

We certainly would not want any more toasted brains in San Francisco!

posted by : toasted, 17 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Less radiation, less reception

which makes it looks like to the other guy, "I ain't on the train" instead.

posted by : aNewbie, 17 June 2010 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?