The Inquirer-Home

Intel plans supercomputer coprocessor

With a multicore 64-bit chip
Tue Jun 01 2010, 10:28

CHIPMAKER Intel plans to extend its presence in the supercomputer market with multicore 64-bit processors configured as co-processors.

Intel told the world plus dog at the International Super Computing conference in Hamburg that it has a cunning plan to replace lots of standard Xeon processors commonly used in massively parallel supercomputers with many-cored system-on-chip (SoC) processors.

Kirk Skaugen, general manager of Intel's data center group announced what Intel calls its Many Integrated Core architecture, or MIC (pronounced 'mike').

MIC chips will be put into HPC systems as co-processors. If this sounds familiar it is just like what Nvidia is doing with Tesla GPUs and AMD is doing with Stream GPUs.

There are similarities between the MIC chips and Larrabee, a GPGPU project that Intel apparently has abandoned. Larrabee used a superscalar x86 64-bit core and a 512-bit vector math unit. Larrabee also had a very wide ring bus for linking all of the cores and the caches together, which is a big part of MIC's design.

Skaugen said the MIC chip family will be known as Knights, and showed off the "Knights Ferry" coprocessor. It has 32 cores, Skaugen divulged, running at 1.2GHz, and it has four execution threads on each core for a total of 128 threads per chip.

The chip has 8MB of shared coherent cache and 1GB or 2GB of GDDR5 graphics memory for munching numbers. µ

 

Share this:

Comments
I say it's pronounced 'Mick'

Then let's get McDonalds on board. Order a MIC chip and get an order of fries (chips) free :)

posted by : SWeDe, 03 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Heads in the Cloud

I think they are all thinking about cloud computing, why else would they put so much effort into chips for supercomputers.

They are anticipating the day that everyones TV becomes a thin client and consoles and PCs are no more.

If they anticpate it, then it may happen all the sooner for their efforts. Though on the other hand if people are not already starting to try and build these things then there will not be any demand this generation. So turning a profit might be a sticking point. However if they stay out of the game they may lose if someone else developes a winning formula so they have to keep their hand in to keep up with the Joneses.

I hope they know what they are doing though I have a nasty feeling its all a load of hype.

posted by : Zeitgeist Buster, 01 June 2010 Complain about this comment
...

This sounds similar to the AMD Torrenza initiative from 2006, albeit on a grander scale.

posted by : H. Ruiz, 01 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Let's call it

The Core i7-DX

posted by : Dan, 01 June 2010 Complain about this comment
Larrabee rebrand?

Wait. Isn't this a description of a x86 videocard?..

posted by : Iso, 01 June 2010 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?