The Inquirer-Home

EFF names enablers of the Chinese regime

Company list of shame
Wed Feb 03 2010, 15:17

THE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION (EFF) has listed seven Western companies responsible for selling censorship and surveillance technology to the Chinese.

The EFF compiled its "corporations of interest" list from published data on companies that have sold surveillance tools to the Chinese. In strongly worded language, the EFF's Danny O'Brien said the named companies are "fostering repression in China" because the Chinese use the technology for "rampant censorship, invasive data collection and intimidation."

The list is headed by Cisco, which the EFF cited as being heavily involved in building China's Golden Shield Project, that is, the Great Firewall of China. Cisco also ran presentations for Chinese government buyers outlining how its technology could be used to combat religions and other enemies of the Communist state.

Nortel came in second for reported hardware sales to the Great Firewall and developing speech recognition software to monitor telephone conversations. Third was Oracle, which has reported that a third of its business in China is for the government. Motorola was listed fourth for selling small data tag devices to Chinese police.

EMC was fifth by virtue of selling data repositories to public security authorities in China. Sybase was listed in sixth place for selling database programs to Shanghai coppers. Finally in seventh place, L-1 Identity Solutions reportedly sold software to Chinese companies that aids government officials in identifying individuals for purposes of criminal investigations.

O'Brien wrote the article off the back of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's speech last week on US policy in favour of worldwide Internet freedom. The speech included an attempt to address the responsibilities of American technology companies in a global market

Clinton said, "We are urging U.S. media companies to take a proactive role in challenging foreign governments' demands for censorship and surveillance. The private sector has a shared responsibility to help safeguard free expression. And when their business dealings threaten to undermine this freedom, they need to consider what's right, not simply what's a quick profit."

O'Brien invoked a six point solution in the hope of engendering transparent trade with China by American companies. That included clarifying the relationship with the Chinese government and publicly disclosing every aspect of the transaction, from the products and services sold to how US companies can take steps to ensure they're not being used to violate human rights.

The EFF's O'Brien didn't go into detail about how IT companies might control what government customers, including not only the Chinese but also Western government agencies, might do with the equipment and software they buy. Not even the EFF is brave enough to suggest not selling it to them in the first place, apparently. µ

Share this:

Comments
Now what about the U.S. list?

Would be curious to see the list of companies which provide domestic surveillance technology to the U.S. government.

Or aren't we supposed to talk about that?

posted by : SV Guy, 03 February 2010 Complain about this comment
new world order

Would be curious to see the list of companies which provide domestic surveillance technology to the U.S. government.
Aye i'd like to see that myself

to get the new world order you know it will be some sort of communistic government.
so they test the technology where its being used the most to perfect it .
Sad trading security for freedom

posted by : corwin155, 03 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Sad indeed

I will disagree with companies like EMC, who only got on the list for selling kit to the Chinese. I mean, EMC only sells enterprise storage. How the Chinese use that kit is up to them.

I would like to see the US list as well. And the UK list for that matter.

posted by : nECrO, 03 February 2010 Complain about this comment
"rampant censorship, invasive data collection and intimidation"

Sounds just like the thing G.W. Bush has laid upon the American people.

What cornwin155 says is true.....Occidental countries give and maintain this sort of technology to poorer countries in exchange for the information they collect. From the results they observe they will then implement what they can get away with in their own territories.

posted by : me, 03 February 2010 Complain about this comment
You can bet

You can bet that the products being sold to China were developed for domestic use in the first place.

If I did purchase Cisco equipment (which I don't) you can be this would be the end of that.

I wonder if selling such tech is really legal? considering the use.

posted by : Vinster, 03 February 2010 Complain about this comment
NWO is _very_ old news

Vinster,

Visit TPUC, there you will learn that Legal is lies and BS, which does not apply to us if we say NO; even Common Law is not much better given the elite may still regard us as things (slaves) rather than people, or even sovereign human beings.

Well I own Au & Ag Bullion (real money), know about corporations, am saying NO, and using NCRTS, I'm reading the Starving the Monkeys book (and the set books), so they are F'd if these status obsessed freaks think they can mess with me and win.

I also us P2P because it is nonsense to pay fiat-debt funded corporations for ephemera, if you have the option not to.

posted by : Polar Bear, 06 February 2010 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Microsoft has ended Windows XP SP2 support ...

and this will make me: