- Wednesday, 10 February 2010
- INQ Mobile
- RSS
Each snowflake in an avalanche pleads not guilty - Stanislaw J. Lec
Microsoft nicks another man's patents
SOFTWARE MONOPOLIST Microsoft seems to be patenting stuff like crazy.
Volish employees Samuel Chow Radakovitz, Adam Michael Buerman, Anupam Garg, Matthew John Androski, Matthew Kevin Becker and Brian Ruble apparently had a brillian insight one morning and got patent 20090282325.
The thing is that the patent describes something called Sparkline which is a type of information graphic usually associated with stock market reports.
'Sparkline' was invented by Edward Tufte for "small, high resolution graphics embedded in a context of words, numbers, images."
When Microsoft jacked Sparkline into Excel it had no problems naming Tufte as the inventor. However now the Vole appears to have claimed to have invented the whole thing itself.
Writing in his blog, Tufte is understandably upset. Everyone in the industry knows that it was his idea, even Microsoft. Google even uses them in its software.
The problem is that the Voles might have worked out a way of sticking Sparklines in Excel spreadsheets, but the patent implies they invented it originally.
We think this should be a classic case of whoops and apologies from Microsoft. µ
Share this:
ShareBusiness Intelligence Software
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Enterprise Accounting Software
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Enterprise Systems Management
a classic case of whoops and apologies from Microsoft.
With MS as heavy as the Higgs boson and its time travel to prevent the LHC from working, you must admit to the possibility that MS actually invented it and has a retrospective right to world+dog.
I can't believe someone was actually able to patent the graph.
more sloppy journalism you did not read the patent or http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0003Y1&topic_id=1
Although it is more patent trolling by ms.
And Nick nicks another man's article!
As per usual...
It's a software patent. Those shouldn't exist at all. I have trouble feeling sorry for this man.
The patent application specifically cites Tufte for Sparklines. Did you people do ANY research at all before writing this FUD piece?
This whole article is very confusing to read. I've re-read it a few times but isn't making more sense.
Here's how it currently reads:
Tufte invents Sparklines.
Volish (What's Volish?) employees later patent the idea.
Microsoft implements Sparklines and credits Tufte.
Vole (What is Vole?) is mad because they claim to have invented it.
Tufte is upset, because everyone uses his software and knows he made it.
Is there a certain amount of LSD required before reading this? Who green-lit this article?
"The patent application specifically cites Tufte for Sparklines."
And? That's like taking someone else's homework and instead of crossing their name out before writing your own on, you just write "inspired by" in front of their name instead.
Yet more looting of the commons by the Vole and their corrupt patent-loving chums. You'd think that the last thing Uncle Sam would do would be to grant monopolies to a monopolist but, oh I suddenly remember: they let them off!
The US Patent Office: corporate welfare for the super-rich.
You're obviously new here. The Vole is the Inq's nickname for Microsoft. Anyone who has read this site for more than a week will know that.
And yes, there is a certain amount of LSD required to publish articles here. That is what makes this site different from other bland news sites.