The Inquirer-Home

Supercomputing will get an SSD upgrade

Flash Gordon to the rescue
Wed Nov 11 2009, 17:36

THE SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER (SDSC) plans to build a supercomputer that uses massive amounts of flash based memory to help improve processing speeds.

Using a $20 million grant from the National Science Foundation, the SDSC is building Gordon, a supercomputer designed to tackle 'critical science and societal problems now overwhelmed by the avalanche of data generated by the digital devices of our era', which is expected to be operational in mid-2011.

Once up and running, Gordon will feature 245 teraFLOPS (TF) of total compute power, 64TB of DRAM, 256TB of flash memory and four petabytes of disk storage, placing it pretty high in the Top 500 supercomputers list.

Although Gordon packs some impressive raw processing power, the architecture is specifically designed to cope with high performance computing (HPC) problems that involve large data sets. It will make optimal use of tiered storage to ensure that processors are not left waiting for data from slower spinning disk storage.

"We are clearly excited about the potential for Gordon," said Michael Norman, interim director of the SDSC.

"This HPC system will allow researchers to tackle a growing list of critical 'data-intensive' problems. These include the analysis of individual genomes to tailor drugs to specific patients, the development of more accurate models to predict the impact of earthquakes on buildings and other structures, and simulations that offer greater insights into what's happening to the planet's climate."

Gordon will be built primarily on Intel hardware, using the newest processors and SSD technology available in 2011. The entire system will consist of 32 'supernodes', each of which will be comprised of 32 compute nodes with 64GB of DRAM capable of 240 gigaFLOPS of processing power.

The supernodes will each incorporate two I/O nodes, each with 4TB of flash memory, that will be interconnected via an Infiniband network capable of 16Gbps bi-directional bandwidth. When tied together by virtual shared memory, each supernode will have 2TB of DRAM and 8TB of flash memory, with the potential for nearly 7.7TF of compute power.

"SDSC's Gordon will be the most recent tool that can be applied to data-driven scientific exploration," explained José Muñoz, deputy director and senior science advisor for the National Science Foundation's Office of Cyberinfrastructure.

"It was conceived and designed to enable scientists and engineers -indeed any area requiring demanding extensive data analysis - to conduct their research unburdened by the significant latencies that impede much of today's progress."

The SDSC reckons that Gordon will be perfect for 'data-mining' tasks, crunching not just large volumes of data, but massive chunks of information such as the huge quantities of raw data from three-dimensional seismic tomographic images used to understand and predict the impact of large-scale earthquakes on buildings and other structures along major fault lines.

In these applications, large databases could be loaded into flash memory and queried with much lower latency than if they were resident on disk.

"Moving a physical disk-head to accomplish random I/O is so last-century," said Allan Snavely, associate director of SDSC and co-principal investigator for this innovative system.

"Indeed, Charles Babbage designed a computer based on moving mechanical parts almost two centuries ago. With respect to I/O, it's time to stop trying to move protons and just move electrons. With the aid of flash solid-state drives (SSDs), this system should do latency-bound file reads 10 times faster and more efficiently than anything done today."

Full details of the new system will be unveiled at the international Supercomputing Conference 2009 on high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis to be held in Portland, Oregon from 14 to 20 November. µ

Share this:

Comments
I thought those SSD have write limits

that they will fail after certain number of writes. Unless your supercomputer that don't write on those SSDs, otherwise you will be replacing SSDs periodically...

posted by : aNewbie, 13 November 2009 Complain about this comment
No So HiPs on Gordon

I heared he's blind in one eye and can't spell out the other one.

posted by : Blimey, 12 November 2009 Complain about this comment
Only 200 tflops?

Didn't I hear the newer processors in a desktop will reach 200 tflops around then? Sandy Bridge 120? One after that 200?

I don't know if that's such a good thing if a year later a $2000 desktop has even 1/2 its speed.

Not sure though

posted by : J, 12 November 2009 Complain about this comment
Crysis

I'm betting it still can't break 60 fps in Crysis. LOL!

posted by : Cowzilla, 11 November 2009 Complain about this comment
Naming homage

*Snicker* @ Flash Gordon.

I was thinking Gordon the mute hero of the Half Life franchise.

posted by : JP C, 11 November 2009 Complain about this comment
New Review Coming Soon

Next month, we plan to benchmark it using Sandra and see how many FPS it can run Crysis.

posted by : Tom's Hardware, 11 November 2009 Complain about this comment
Flash Gordon

haha!

posted by : Alex Raymond, 11 November 2009 Complain about this comment
Only 256TB?

My "rough estimates" would be 3.2mil US$ for the flash drives (12,800$ a TB for X25-E 64GB). That would account for 13% of the total budget.

Going with 300GB 15k SAS 3Gb HD's would be about 900 drives, costing 96,000$, or about .5% of the budget or 3% of the cost (yeah probably 50 times more power consuption and heat production) of the Intel drives.

This comes out to a handy size of 4096 SSD's. Going with Intel's 250MB/s read 180MB/s write that gives a total theoretical output of 1000GB/s read 720GB/s write.

Why do I need seem underwhelmed by these numbers? I don't really see the purpose of all those SSD's when on can load up on memory instead.

24GB of ECC DDR3 for about 1,500$. 2731 (64TB) of these bad boys for 4.1 million. Which is more cost than the hard drives, and an order of magnitude faster.

If I was totally interested in IOps, I'd go with 256TB of SAS and the money I'd save would double the amount of memory to 128TB.

OH WAIT...I totally forget about Intel kickbacks and whatnot, so I'd have to use some Hollywood accounting to figure it out now! I'll just watch a BD-rip of 9 now instead of thinking anymore.

/bored at work on a Remembrance Day, shout out to the troops!

Drashek, I dare you to make less sense than I do!

posted by : Steve-O, 11 November 2009 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?