It's not a V bottom, it's not a U bottom, it's a Nike swoosh recovery - Greg McLenon, Hotovec Pomeranz
ALTHOUGH VIA has had a rather poor track record in scoring design wins and putting products on store shelves, it has launched its Nano 3000 low-power notebook CPU, just 10-months after the official-unofficial announcement.

We'll recommend putting the champagne back on ice, tho'.
The Nano 3000 isn’t a new CPU. It’s still a 65nm-built CPU and not even dual-core for that matter. The introduction of the 3000-series brings out six additional SKUs. You can compare the old Nanos (2000-series) with the new ones, listed below.
New vs. Old SKUs
What you can immediately see here is that there is little improvement in of raw power numbers on these devices. Via did not reveal Load values for these processors.
However, as Via re-spun the original silicon it added support for SSE4 instructions, which allows the Nano 3000 to gain some serious improvements in any SSE4-enabled game or benchmark. According to Via, the Nano 3000 processor outperforms the Atom by as much as 42 per cent in PC Mark and 34.5 per cent in Cinebench R10, clock-for-clock. Additionally, Via slideware claims the Chrome9 HC3 graphics kicks Intel’s GMA 950 around the block and back.
Via is pushing for thin and light notebook designs, netbooks if you will, but it doesn’t restrict its partners on their form factors or use of operating systems, something that Via has failed to leverage so far.
The Nano 3000 is on the way to becoming the second chapter for a promising architecture that didn't fully deliver on timings and execution, and by the timings on this one, Intel and AMD will steal Via's thunder again.
Why else has there been so much buzz about Intel releasing dual-core Atoms and loosening restrictions on netbooks in late 2009 and early 2010?
So, Via, we're still waiting for those dual-cores. µ
I really wish they would do something more with their x86 license.
Get some fresh investment, poach from Intel, get IBM, AMD, ARM, even nVidia involved in some sort of partnership to shake up the x86 arena. AMD can't fight the good fight all by itself forever.
I can think of several areas that VIA needs to strenghten itself..
1 - They need dual cores.. badly
2 - Strategic partnetship with Nvidia to get more powerfull graphics.
3 - Shrink from 65nm to 45nm to allow faster clockspeeds.
4 - They need to have products out in shops.. in my country there is only one retailer.. And im still missing the Nano cpu in any mini-itx/mATX offering from them.
Questions, why does it get slower as Model numbers get larger. for half watt, L2 cache of 1 mb is ?extraordinary.
Compared to Lesbo .oo
Oh,Oh, Never Mind.
drashek
What Via really needs to do is get their act together with some Linux drivers. If you get the nerds/geeks using your products they'll spread the word. Get your act together, open up your docu like AMD is doing. Don't give us little bits to work with, it's not going to cut it.
I bought a stepnote a while back, with the C7-M in it. Biggest mistake ever. Not a shred of Linux support on the thing, constantly crashes when trying to do anything productive. It's too slow to run windows with any amount of respect imho. Picked up a dv2z-1100, best decision ever, excellent Linux support, excellent video acceleration.
I want to support VIA and buy a Nano-based netbook. But two big probs:
1/ Sucky proprietary chipsets. I would never touch a Chrome unless Linux support was close to AMD, Nvidia, or Intel.
2/ Even if I wanted to, I couldn't find any available in NZ anyway.
Can't see how VIA is making any money with lame, proprietary drivers and such poor availability.