WIMAX MIGHT NEVER amount to much more than a niche market technology, according to a recent report from analyst firm Ovum.
According to its WiMax in emerging markets: the opportunity assessed report, Ovum reckons that, not only has the next generation mobile data access platform struggled to take off in developed regions like Europe, North America and Asia, but it could face a tough time in emerging markets as well.
Despite the low fixed-line penetration in developing nations, factors such as cost, coverage, vendor support and service provider choices will hinder uptake of the technology, although that is not expected to impact the distribution of these networks in the short term.
"Two thirds of the 300+ WiMax networks globally are in the emerging markets of Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Middle East and Latin America," said Angel Dobardziev, practice leader at Ovum.
"Yet, most emerging market WiMax operators currently have thousands, or tens of thousands of subscribers, rather than the hundreds of thousands of subscribers that they planned to have at this stage."
As of August 2009, Russian operator Scartel is the first emerging WiMax player to have hit the 100,000 subscriber mark, ahead of Packet One in Malaysia with 80,000, with the majority of players lagging behind their initial rollout and subscriber targets.
The problem, it seems, is that WiMax doesn't stack up as sufficiently competitive against other fixed or mobile technologies in the urban areas, and the harsh economic climate makes it difficult for these companies to get the funding required to roll them out to the greenfield locales where they would be more competitive.
"On a non-subsidised basis, it is currently priced and positioned as a broadband option only for businesses or wealthy consumers," explained Dobardziev.
"The cost of customer equipment remains the key stumbling block for WiMax operators, where both DSL and HSPA outperform WiMax with significantly greater economies of scale."
As a result, Ovum expects WiMax to suffer the same fate in these developing nations as it has in mature markets - becoming a part of the fabric of broadband access, rather than the shining star of wireless data accessibility.
"We forecast that WiMax will account for less than five per cent of the 1.5 [billion] fixed and mobile broadband access connections in the emerging markets by 2014," concluded Dobardziev.
"WiMax coverage will remain mostly in large urban centres where it will compete against DSL, HSPA/EV-DO and in some cases fibre services. We expect DSL and HSPA/EV-DO to remain more cost and price competitive against WiMax in the next five years in terms of infrastructure, and particularly customer equipment."
If Ovum's predictions are correct, this then leads to a vicious cycle, as device manufacturers will be less inclined to incorporate WiMax support into laptops, phones and other connected consumer electronics - which in turn will reduce uptake and so even further lessen demand.
The report doesn't mention whether WiMax's biggest rival, long term evolution (LTE), might suffer the same fate. But as it is starting to reach the point of significant trials with rollouts expected in the not too distant future, arriving late to the party might actually be a good thing for the technology as signs of slow recovery are starting to appear and demand for mobile data access is starting to approach the limits of what current platforms can deliver. µ
Agree, as long as there is no Naugthy Indonesia Operator who limit the bandwitdh to 6 KB/s. I am now using "The New And Improved" Real "HSDPA" 6 KB/s Telkomsel Unlimited that is limited. If they can market 6 KB/s HSDPA, I am afraid they can also do the same for WiMAX, 4G, 5G, 6G, you name it. :((.
I agree with Hok - the wimax providers in Pakistan all offer ridiculous data quantity limited packages. so they will market them as 1Mbit connections but the fine print says you get 15 gigs of total bandwidth (upload and download included) which is ridiculous in todays world.
I think most providers are still muddling around on which market to target - the well heeled customers that can afford to pay more but want better or the volume customers that need basics but at a much lower price.
By not making cost effective devices Device Manufaturers kept Wimax failed. Only one Wimax is on the face of this earth and that too is 2.5GHz wimax the HTC MAX4G. Most Wimax setups are 3.5GHz band. Others devices are some MIDs which are not phones and WiBro (not true Wimax) Phones.
I had very high hopes with HTC and Samsung which should have become real a year ago. And from both of these parties its very sad to see that when they are launchin ver "2" of every device Storm2, Touchpro2 etc but no Max4G-2.
http://www.gsmarena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=21045&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15
I have read the Ovum Report, and believe Ovum was clearly sponsored by either the GSM Association or conglomerate Mobile Operators who stand to get thrashed in the market. To even suggest 3G or HSDPA+ of any form is even COMPARABLE to mobile (not legacy fixed 802.16d!) WiMAX is rediculous. Its getting old, they are terrified about whats happening in this converged world. The uplink is the key people, and the data delivery speeds capable via this 802.16e are superior in every regard because it has REAL QoS over the Radio interface/bearer. When will everyone just stop believing the marketing FUD and MNO vendors like NSN/Ericsson/AlcaLU hype, LTE+ is not due until 2013 at the earliest -- and is a complete rip off from 802.16m subset. By 2013 WiMAX will have changed the world, starting with Clearwire, UQ and Yota are doing the data roaming. 9 years after DoCoMo's launch (i was there!), the MNO's still cant roam economically for 3g data usage. 3.5Ghz mobility licenses are not also being assigned (OFCOM UK) for WiMAX's which has got the MNO's on the run. More countries are following this regulatory lead - and the point made earlier by someone about the devices not arriving is going to change. The fundamental reason for delays, is because the handset vendors are being threatened by MNO customers to slow down 4G's adoption until LTE(basic not plus) arrives to suit their business models. ie: WiMAX went live in 2007 and is technically as well as theoretically a 4G delivery mechanism. Wake up people, this Alcatel Lucent CEO war cry of "niche rural technology" is getting old. Ben messed up the 21cn for BT before bailing out, and is definitely NOT (never was or will be) qualified to speak on subjects such as Next Generation Networks, let alone 4G Wireless realities in 2009!