IN AN INTERVIEW with CNBC's newsroom, Yahoo's CEO Carol Bartz implied that the company's former chief executive Jerry Yang was "stupid" for turning down Microsoft's initial offers to buy the firm last year.
Bartz joined Yahoo in January from Autodesk and immediately set about putting her stamp on the troubled company. Now, some nine months later, in a congenial CNBC Squawkbox interview, she was bullish about her role and where she sees the pioneering Internet search portal and advertising firm making an impact.
One thing Bartz would have changed, had she assumed her position earlier, was the final selling price of the firm to Microsoft. Responding to a question from the show hosts on whether she would have taken Microsoft's original bid, Bartz replied, "Sure. You think I'm stupid? Let's see, 15 or 34? Yeah, I think so."
Regardless, she asserted that the final deal was good for Yahoo as it will allow the firm to concentrate on two things, innovation and revenues. "We can take costs down and still take 80 per cent of the revenues," she said. "And we can add focus to where we add value." Which apparently is in contextual or, as she called it, 'emotional' advertising.
Bartz was a bit woolly about how the firm will innovate, suggesting only that what Internet users need is a one-stop online destination for all their relevant information and material. Something that sounds a lot like the old portal or MyYahoo approach to us.
Possibly referring to Google's bleak, minimalist homepage as search query design, she said, "I don't wake up in the morning and say 'Gosh what am I going to search?' I wake up and say 'what's happening?'"
In order to make her company's new look MyYahoo more popular, since the old version was adopted by only 15 per cent of users, Bartz said that the firm has made it easier for lazy bones users to add more features, because apparently no one could be bothered to do that with the old version.
Groundbreaking stuff, to be sure. µ
It should come as no shockwave,_
theinquirer.net that is.
What a day. The sun is out, birds are singing, bees are trying to have sex with them -- as is my understanding ...
I've been a Yahoo! user since the very beginning. They offer a lot of services that could be very helpful and entertaining, but Yahoo! never really perfects anything. They get a good idea, do is half a$$ed and then move on. For example, Yahoo! chat rooms. They were becoming very popular and then the bots moved in and all the users left. Yahoo! never did anything about the bots and now Yahoo! chat rooms are a near ghost town with the exception of millions of bots. Think about it, Yahoo! had a way to get users to sit still at one window for an hour or more. I bet Google wishes they would have something that would keep their users staring at ads for long periods of time. In the long run Yahoo! won't be here unless they start providing services that work well.
I see the point that she is making refering to Yahoo as a news center rather than a search bar with the "whats going on" statement - but she hasn't figured out that there is more to the net than Yahoo and it could be the reason why Google has prospered.
crawl back to hell were ya came from and be google's (long inhale) BI*&!@#$
All you have to do to see the future of Yahoo is look at the disaster Bartz left at Autodesk. Financially, Autodesk looks great, but it was all at the expense of the end user and the product line.
The Bartz philosophy is the destructive one of boosting performance measurement numbers at the expense of everything else, then dumping the company on a rich stupid buyer.