Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

DRAM price on the rise

Windows 7 to blame
Tuesday, 21 July 2009, 15:07

COMPUTER MEMORY chip makers are seeing prices for their products rising.

According to a report by DRAMeXchange the price of DRAM has increased since global PC makers geared up for back-to-school and holiday sales later this year.

These back to school sales are expected to be stronger due to the arrival of Microsoft's Windows 7 in October.

There are also new 'must have' gizmos that are appearing in the shops which use lots of DRAM. These include the new CULV laptops, designed with powerful but low voltage microprocessors from Intel.

Taiwanese contract manufacturers are reporting that CULV laptops have created a sudden surge in their bottom lines. We assume this means that they are having to buy bigger trousers, but DRAMeXchange does not report on trouser sales in Taiwan which is odd because we would have though this a key indicator.

Monthly shipments at Quanta Computer, the world's largest contract laptop maker, surged to 3.3 million units in June from 2.3 million in May.

DRAM prices started creeping up three weeks ago as manufacturing picked up, and contract prices for chips delivered in the second half of July surged. DDR3 DRAM chips are apparently big sellers.

Contract prices of 1Gigabit DDR3 DRAM chips running at 1066MHz for the second half of July rose 10 percent.

Average prices for the chips were $1.34 each. Prices of the most widely used chips, 1Gb DDR2 at 800MHz, increased as much as 6.6 percent, with the average price at $1.22. µ

 

Share this:

Comments
All comes crashing down

And then when the Christmas sales fall flat, you'll see a glut and then the news headlines will read, "The bottom falls out of the DRAM market"

posted by : Doug, 21 July 2009 Complain about this comment
But...

I thought Windows 7 was supposed to me much nicer and less of a memory muncher than Vista... And of course everyone bought Vista and must be upgrading from that...

Ohhh...

Okay, I guess Win7 isn't a thrifty as XP then?

posted by : Steve, 21 July 2009 Complain about this comment
@Steve

I think the point was that people will be buying new computers, not people will be buying new ram for their computers. And from what I've seen, win7 does use less ram than vista. Of course xp uses less, but win98 uses even less than that, and dos... well that uses almost none.

posted by : jj, 21 July 2009 Complain about this comment
@steve

"Okay, I guess Win7 isn't a thrifty as XP then?"

Based on nothing more than my own observations...

It's not as thrifty as XP no, however it's not unreasonable in it's memory use as far as I'm concerned. The initial bootum usage is higher, but I'd say it scales fairly similarly to XP running similar apps.

In daily usage I've struggled to hit 3G memory use, whereas I'd peak around 1.5-2G in XP doing similar stuff. (Not games.) This is 64bit Win 7 VS 32bit XP.

I've not used Vista enough to compare that I'm afraid. (It's amazing how bloody awful Vista is compared to W7, despite them being .1 apart in versions.)

FWIW having just checked, in July 2004 I paid the princely sum of 105 pounds (and 2 pence!) for 2 512MB sticks of RAM; earlier this year I paid 32quid for 2 2G sticks. That's over 8 times the storage for a similar price; W7 is nowhere near 8 times as greedy as XP.

posted by : FIA, 21 July 2009 Complain about this comment
Yes

Steve said "I thought Windows 7 was supposed to me much nicer and less of a memory muncher than Vista"

I found Vista to take around 1200MB while Windows 7 used 800MB. Eitherway when you are caching things it shock horror uses ram!

posted by : John, 22 July 2009 Complain about this comment
RAM

If my RAM isn't being used, it's being wasted. Better to have Windows caching stuff ahead of time than load data from the slow disk after my drive has spun down.

And really, who cares if it's being used? If it ever becomes a problem, you need to buy some more; there is no excuse anymore. RAM is cheap and plentiful, even with these "rising prices." Even my netbook has 2GB of RAM.

posted by : BB, 23 July 2009 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Nvidia Fermi

Will graphics cards built with Nvidia's Fermi GPUs be a hit?